Skip to content

Qwen3 Coder Next vs GLM 5

Qwen3 Coder Next

Alibaba

40#333
vs
GLM 5

Zhipu AI

40#332
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalQwen3 Coder NextDeltaGLM 5
Capabilities
50
-17
67
Pricing
99
+2
97
Context window size
86
+2
84
Recency
83
-1
85
Output Capacity
86
+4
82
Overall Result
3 wins
of 5
2 wins
Qwen3 Coder Next wins 3 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (38 data points)
Qwen3 Coder NextGLM 5
Qwen3 Coder Next

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

GLM 5

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Qwen3 Coder Next

Alibaba

Best Value
Per request$0.000520
Daily$1.73
Monthly$52.00
Annual$624.00

GLM 5

Zhipu AI

Per request$0.002600
Daily$8.67
Monthly$260.00
Annual$3120.00

Qwen3 Coder Next saves you $208.00/month

That's $2496.00/year compared to GLM 5 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

80% cheaper
Choose Qwen3 Coder Next for cost optimization

Qwen3 Coder Next pricing:
Input:$0.12/M tokens
Output:$0.80/M tokens
GLM 5 pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$3.20/M tokens
Tie
Qwen3 Coder Next

Alibaba

40

Composite Score

Tie
GLM 5

Zhipu AI

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricQwen3 Coder NextGLM 5Winner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#333#332
GLM 5
Quality Rank#333#332
GLM 5
Adoption Rank#333#332
GLM 5
Parameters------
Context Window262K205K
Qwen3 Coder Next
Pricing$0.12/$0.80/M$1.00/$3.20/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
67
GLM 5
Pricing
99
97
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context window size
86
84
Qwen3 Coder Next
Recency
83
85
GLM 5
Output Capacity
86
82
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Qwen3 Coder NextEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #333), placing it in the top -14% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
GLM 5Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #332), placing it in the top -14% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Qwen3 Coder Next when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose GLM 5 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Qwen3 Coder NextBest Value
Input cost$0.12/M tokens
Output cost$0.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.023
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$13.80
GLM 5
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$3.20/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.105
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$63.00

Qwen3 Coder Next offers 78% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $13.80/month with Qwen3 Coder Next vs $63.00/month with GLM 5 - a $49.20 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Qwen3 Coder NextFaster
Speed score0/100
GLM 5
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Qwen3 Coder Next

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Qwen3 Coder Next also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Qwen3 Coder Next

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen3 Coder Next

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Qwen3 Coder Next

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Qwen3 Coder Next
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next and GLM 5 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Qwen3 Coder Next
Recommended

by Alibaba

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 78% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Zhipu AI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityQwen3 Coder NextGLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Qwen3 Coder Next

Alibaba

Best Value
$1.18
estimated monthly cost

GLM 5

Zhipu AI

$5.64
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3 Coder Next saves you $4.46/month

That's 79% cheaper than GLM 5 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterQwen3 Coder NextGLM 5
Context Window262K205K
Max Output Tokens235,929131,072
Open SourceYesYes
CreatedFeb 4, 2026Feb 11, 2026
Last updated: 20m ago

相关对比

Qwen3 Coder Next vs GLM 5 (2026) | LM Market Cap