AI Models by Provider
Browse 470 AI models from 69 providers. Compare model lineups, pricing strategies, and capabilities across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and more.
All Providers - Ranked by Top Model Score
| # | Provider | Models | Top Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | 30 | 96 |
| 2 | OpenAI | 100 | 93 |
| 3 | 45 | 92 | |
| 4 | xAI | 10 | 89 |
| 5 | ~x-ai | 11 | 89 |
| 6 | DeepSeek | 16 | 83 |
| 7 | Alibaba | 43 | 71 |
| 8 | Meta | 17 | 70 |
| 9 | Zhipu AI | 19 | 70 |
| 10 | ~z-ai | 21 | 70 |
| 11 | Mistral AI | 21 | 68 |
| 12 | Cursor | 2 | 66 |
| 13 | MiniMax | 7 | 64 |
| 14 | Microsoft | 1 | 61 |
| 15 | Cohere | 6 | 52 |
| 16 | Moonshot AI | 9 | 48 |
| 17 | ~moonshotai | 10 | 48 |
| 18 | NVIDIA | 11 | 40 |
| 19 | Tencent | 8 | 40 |
| 20 | ByteDance | 7 | 40 |
| 21 | Liquid AI | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | aion-labs | 5 | 40 |
| 23 | Xiaomi | 5 | 40 |
| 24 | inclusionai | 4 | 40 |
| 25 | sakana | 4 | 40 |
| 26 | Inception | 3 | 40 |
| 27 | unbiased | 2 | 40 |
| 28 | StepFun | 3 | 40 |
| 29 | thinkingmachines | 3 | 40 |
| 30 | prism-ml | 2 | 40 |
| 31 | moondream | 2 | 40 |
| 32 | scaledown | 2 | 40 |
| 33 | perceptron | 2 | 40 |
| 34 | Upstage | 2 | 40 |
| 35 | inference-net | 2 | 40 |
| 36 | ricursiveai | 1 | 40 |
| 37 | particle-ai | 1 | 40 |
| 38 | recursive | 1 | 40 |
| 39 | elorian | 1 | 40 |
| 40 | xingchen-agi | 1 | 40 |
| 41 | reflection | 1 | 40 |
| 42 | typesafe | 1 | 40 |
| 43 | fireworks | 1 | 40 |
| 44 | IBM | 1 | 40 |
| 45 | dots-studio | 1 | 40 |
| 46 | Meituan | 1 | 40 |
| 47 | TII | 7 | - |
| 48 | Amazon | 5 | - |
| 49 | Perplexity | 5 | - |
| 50 | HUMAIN | 4 | - |
| 51 | rekaai | 2 | - |
| 52 | Stability AI | 2 | - |
| 53 | Writer | 1 | - |
| 54 | Windsurf | 1 | - |
| 55 | Vercel | 1 | - |
| 56 | stealth | 1 | - |
| 57 | JetBrains | 1 | - |
| 58 | Wan AI | 1 | - |
| 59 | Lightricks | 1 | - |
| 60 | Pika | 1 | - |
| 61 | Kuaishou | 1 | - |
| 62 | Runway | 1 | - |
| 63 | Luma AI | 1 | - |
| 64 | Recraft | 1 | - |
| 65 | Midjourney | 1 | - |
| 66 | Black Forest Labs | 1 | - |
| 67 | Ideogram | 1 | - |
| 68 | Leonardo AI | 1 | - |
| 69 | Adobe | 1 | - |
Choosing an AI Provider
Full-Stack Providers
Companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google offer multiple model tiers (premium, mid, budget), API platforms, and enterprise support - a one-stop solution for most use cases.
Open Source Leaders
Meta (Llama), Mistral, and DeepSeek release open-weight models you can self-host. This gives you full control, zero per-token costs, and the ability to fine-tune.
API Aggregators
Multi-model API platforms provide a single API to access models from multiple providers - great for flexibility and comparison without managing multiple accounts.
Multi-Provider Strategy
Many teams use different providers for different tasks: a premium model for complex reasoning, a budget model for classification, and an open-source model for self-hosted data processing.
Our tracker monitors 350+ models across 55+ providers. The largest providers by model count include OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta, and Mistral. Visit individual provider pages to see their full model lineup with pricing and benchmarks.
Consider your primary use case, budget, and technical requirements. OpenAI offers the broadest ecosystem, Anthropic leads in safety and reasoning, Google provides strong multimodal capabilities, and Meta offers the best open-source options. Our provider comparison tools help you evaluate each option.
Most providers we track offer API access, though pricing models vary. Some offer free tiers, while others require paid plans. Open-source providers like Meta distribute model weights for self-hosting, giving you full control over deployment and costs.