Skip to content
Benchmark category

Arena Benchmarks

Compare top models across the benchmark suite that best represents arena performance. Use this page as the fastest way to inspect the relevant tests, then jump into the full matrix when you want broader context.

2

Benchmarks in category

66

Models with coverage

0

Benchmarks with human baseline

0

Saturated benchmarks

What Is Included

The current benchmark set in this category, with context on what each test captures.

All benchmarks

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo Rating

The most trusted 'vibes-based' benchmark — reflects real human preferences, not just academic metrics. Widely considered the most meaningful overall ranking.

Elo rating

LiveBench (Dynamic)

Contamination-free by design — uses new questions regularly. Top models still score below 70%, making it highly discriminating.

average score %
Model type:

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo Rating

Human preference rating from 6M+ crowdsourced blind head-to-head comparisons. Users chat with two anonymous models and pick the better response.

Metric: Elo rating

Why it matters

The most trusted 'vibes-based' benchmark — reflects real human preferences, not just academic metrics. Widely considered the most meaningful overall ranking.

Arena Elo Scores (57 models)

Standard Reasoning Hybrid
LMMarketCap.com
#ModelScore
1🥇Claude Opus 4.61503
2🥈Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1494
3🥉Gemini 3.1 Pro1494
4Claude Opus 4.71491
5Gemini 3 Pro1486
6GPT-5.41485
7GPT-5.21481
8Claude Opus 4.81479
9Gemini 3.5 Flash1477
10GPT-5.11475
11GPT-5.51475
12Gemini 3 Flash1474
13GPT-51465
14DeepSeek V4 Pro1463
15Grok 41462
16Claude Sonnet 4.61460
17Claude Sonnet 4.51452
18Grok 4.31446
19Gemini 2.5 Pro1444
20DeepSeek V4 Flash1433
21Claude Opus 4.51430
22DeepSeek V3.21425
23Claude Opus 41420
24o31415
25Gemini 2.5 Flash1395
26Claude Sonnet 41387
27o4-mini1380
28DeepSeek R1-05281380
29o3-mini1371
30DeepSeek R11369
31Claude 3.7 Sonnet1354
32Gemini 2.0 Flash1352
33o11350
34DeepSeek V3 (March 2025)1345
35Grok 31342
36o1 Preview1334
37Llama 4 Maverick1325
38DeepSeek V31318
39o1-mini1304
40GPT-4.11300
41GPT-4o1286
42Gemini 1.5 Pro1281
43Mistral Large 21280
44Claude 3.5 Sonnet1271
45Grok 21262
46Qwen 2.5 72B1261
47Command A1261
48GPT-4 Turbo1255
49Mistral Large 21250
50Llama 3.3 70B1243
51Claude Haiku 4.51240
52Claude 3 Opus1232
53Llama 3.1 405B1229
54GPT-4o mini1222
55Llama 3.1 70B1198
56Claude 3.5 Haiku1178
57Mixtral 8x22B1146

How to Read This Page

Performance Tiers

Elite - Top 10% of the score range
Strong - Top 25% of the score range
Good - Above the midpoint
Below Average - Below the midpoint

Model Types

Standard - Direct inference, no chain-of-thought
Reasoning - Extended thinking (o1, R1) - slower but excels on math/reasoning
Hybrid - Optional thinking mode (Claude 3.7, Gemini 2.5) - can switch between fast and deep

Saturated benchmarks have top models clustered above 90%, making them less useful for comparison.

Scores sourced from official model cards, technical reports, and third-party evaluations (Artificial Analysis, LMSYS Arena). Last updated: 2026-11-06T12:30:07.097Z. Some scores are approximate.

Frequently Asked Questions

AI benchmarks are grouped into categories like coding, math, reasoning, knowledge, and safety. Each category contains multiple standardized tests that measure specific aspects of model performance. This page focuses on one category so you can compare models within a specific skill area.

Each benchmark has its own scoring method - accuracy percentage, pass rate, Elo rating, or normalized score. We display raw scores from official evaluations and community-run tests. Scores are updated hourly as new evaluation results become available.

A saturated benchmark is one where top models score near the maximum (typically above 95%). This means the benchmark no longer effectively differentiates between the best models, and newer, harder benchmarks are needed to measure progress.

Arena AI Benchmarks - Compare Top Models | LM Market Cap