Skip to content

ALLaM 1 13B Instruct vs Switchyard

vs
Switchyard

NVIDIA

40#262
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalALLaM 1 13B InstructDeltaSwitchyard
Capabilities
17
--
17
Pricing
98
-1000002
1000100
Context window size
57
-38
95
Recency
10
-90
100
Output Capacity
58
+38
20
Overall Result
1 wins
of 5
3 wins
Switchyard wins 3 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (27 data points)
ALLaM 1 13B InstructSwitchyard
ALLaM 1 13B Instruct

31.3

current score

Leader

Switchyard

right now

Switchyard

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

ALLaM 1 13B Instruct

HUMAIN

Per request$0.002700
Daily$9.00
Monthly$270.00
Annual$3240.00

Switchyard

NVIDIA

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

Switchyard saves you $270.00/month

That's $3240.00/year compared to ALLaM 1 13B Instruct at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose Switchyard for cost optimization

ALLaM 1 13B Instruct pricing:
Input:$1.80/M tokens
Output:$1.80/M tokens
Switchyard pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
ALLaM 1 13B Instruct

HUMAIN

31

Composite Score

Winner
Switchyard

NVIDIA

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricALLaM 1 13B InstructSwitchyardWinner
Overall Score
31
40
Switchyard
Rank#439#262
Switchyard
Quality Rank#439#262
Switchyard
Adoption Rank#439#262
Switchyard
Parameters13B----
Context Window4K1000K
Switchyard
Pricing$1.80/$1.80/MFree--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
17
17
ALLaM 1 13B Instruct
Pricing
98
1000100
Switchyard
Context window size
57
95
Switchyard
Recency
10
100
Switchyard
Output Capacity
58
20
ALLaM 1 13B Instruct
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

ALLaM 1 13B InstructEntry Level

Scores 31/100 (rank #439), placing it in the top -51% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
SwitchyardEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #262), placing it in the top 10% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Switchyard has a 9-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose ALLaM 1 13B Instruct when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements

Choose Switchyard when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
Cost-Performance Analysis
ALLaM 1 13B Instruct
Input cost$1.80/M tokens
Output cost$1.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.115
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$54.00
Switchyard
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
ALLaM 1 13B InstructFaster
Speed score0/100
Switchyard
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

ALLaM 1 13B Instruct

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Switchyard also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

ALLaM 1 13B Instruct

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Switchyard

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Switchyard

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Switchyard
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Switchyard

Switchyard has a moderate advantage with a 8.7-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but ALLaM 1 13B Instruct has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

by HUMAIN

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Switchyard
Recommended

by NVIDIA

  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityALLaM 1 13B InstructSwitchyard
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

ALLaM 1 13B Instruct

HUMAIN

$5.40
estimated monthly cost

Switchyard

NVIDIA

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

Switchyard saves you $5.40/month

That's 100% cheaper than ALLaM 1 13B Instruct at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterALLaM 1 13B InstructSwitchyard
Context Window4K1M
Max Output Tokens4,096--
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedDec 1, 2024Sep 21, 2026
Last updated: 51m ago

Related comparisons

ALLaM 1 13B Instruct vs Switchyard (2026) | LM Market Cap