| Signal | Claude Opus 4 | Delta | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | -17 | |
Benchmarks | 82 | +2 | |
Pricing | 25 | -75 | |
Context window size | 76 | -10 | |
Recency | 60 | -11 | |
Output Capacity | 75 | -5 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 5 wins |
Score History
81.7
current score
Claude Opus 4
right now
78.6
current score
Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite saves you $5220.00/month
That's $62640.00/year compared to Claude Opus 4 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 82 | 79 | Claude Opus 4 |
| Rank | #40 | #53 | Claude Opus 4 |
| Quality Rank | #40 | #53 | Claude Opus 4 |
| Adoption Rank | #40 | #53 | Claude Opus 4 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 200K | 1049K | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Pricing | $15.00/$75.00/M | $0.10/$0.40/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 100 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Benchmarks | 82 | 81 | Claude Opus 4 |
| Pricing | 25 | 100 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Context window size | 76 | 86 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Recency | 60 | 72 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Output Capacity | 75 | 80 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 82/100 (rank #40), placing it in the top 87% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 79/100 (rank #53), placing it in the top 82% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 3-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 99% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $7.50/month with Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs $1350.00/month with Claude Opus 4 - a $1342.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.40/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (82/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Claude Opus 4 has a moderate advantage with a 3.1000000000000085-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
Claude Opus 4
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
99% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Claude Opus 4
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Claude Opus 4
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Claude Opus 4
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Anthropic
| Capability | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite saves you $116.34/month
That's 99% cheaper than Claude Opus 4 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Claude Opus 4 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 32,000 | 65,535 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | May 22, 2025 | Jul 22, 2025 |