Skip to content

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs GPT-5.2 (batch)

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

DeepSeek

40#330
vs
GPT-5.2 (batch)

OpenAI

91#28
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeltaGPT-5.2 (batch)
Capabilities
67
-33
100
Pricing
98
+5
93
Context window size
96
+7
89
Recency
100
+19
81
Output Capacity
89
+8
82
Benchmarks
0
-89
89
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
2 wins
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (8 data points)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2 (batch)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

40

current score

Leader

GPT-5.2 (batch)

right now

GPT-5.2 (batch)

90.5

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

DeepSeek

Best Value
Per request$0.001744
Daily$5.81
Monthly$174.38
Annual$2092.59

GPT-5.2 (batch)

OpenAI

Per request$0.004375
Daily$14.58
Monthly$437.50
Annual$5250.00

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 saves you $263.12/month

That's $3157.41/year compared to GPT-5.2 (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

60% cheaper
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 for cost optimization

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 pricing:
Input:$0.87/M tokens
Output:$1.74/M tokens
GPT-5.2 (batch) pricing:
Input:$0.88/M tokens
Output:$7.00/M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

DeepSeek

40

Composite Score

Winner
GPT-5.2 (batch)

OpenAI

91

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2 (batch)Winner
Overall Score
40
91
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Rank#330#28
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Quality Rank#330#28
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Adoption Rank#330#28
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Parameters------
Context Window1049K400K
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Pricing$0.87/$1.74/M$0.88/$7.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
67
100
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Pricing
98
93
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Context window size
96
89
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Recency
100
81
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Output Capacity
89
82
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Benchmarks--
89
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Benchmark Head-to-Head(11 benchmarks)
DeepSeek V4: 3GPT-5.2 (batch): 1
DeepSeek V4
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-93.5%
MMLU-Pro
87.5%86%
GPQA Diamond
90.1%87%
MATH-500
-94%
HumanEval
-97%
SWE-bench Verified
80.6%78%
IFEval
-93%
BBH
-91.5%
Arena Elo
14631481
LiveBench
-77.5%
HLE
-37%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #330), placing it in the top -13% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
GPT-5.2 (batch)Elite Tier

Scores 91/100 (rank #28), placing it in the top 91% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

GPT-5.2 (batch) has a 51-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose GPT-5.2 (batch) when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Best Value
Input cost$0.87/M tokens
Output cost$1.74/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.065
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$39.24
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Input cost$0.88/M tokens
Output cost$7.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.087
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$118.13

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 offers 67% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $39.24/month with DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs $118.13/month with GPT-5.2 (batch) - a $78.89 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Faster
Speed score0/100
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($1.74/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (91/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GPT-5.2 (batch)

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-5.2 (batch)
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GPT-5.2 (batch)

GPT-5.2 (batch) clearly outperforms DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 with a significant 50.5-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-5.2 (batch) is the stronger choice. However, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 may still excel in niche scenarios.

by DeepSeek

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 67% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
GPT-5.2 (batch)
Recommended

by OpenAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2 (batch)
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

DeepSeek

Best Value
$3.66
estimated monthly cost

GPT-5.2 (batch)

OpenAI

$9.97
estimated monthly cost

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 saves you $6.31/month

That's 63% cheaper than GPT-5.2 (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2 (batch)
Context Window1.0M400K
Max Output Tokens384,000128,000
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedApr 24, 2026Dec 10, 2025
Last updated: 59m ago

Related comparisons

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs GPT-5.2 (batch) (2026) | LM Market Cap