Skip to content

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) vs Grok 4.6

vs
Grok 4.6

xAI

89#31
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)DeltaGrok 4.6
Capabilities
67
-33
100
Pricing
96
+2
94
Context window size
96
+5
90
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
96
+5
90
Benchmarks
0
-86
86
Overall Result
3 wins
of 6
2 wins
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) wins 3 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (3 data points)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)Grok 4.6
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

40

current score

Leader

Grok 4.6

right now

Grok 4.6

88.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

DeepSeek

Best Value
Per request$0.003300
Daily$11.00
Monthly$330.00
Annual$3960.00

Grok 4.6

xAI

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) saves you $170.00/month

That's $2040.00/year compared to Grok 4.6 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

34% cheaper
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) for cost optimization

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) pricing:
Input:$1.32/M tokens
Output:$3.96/M tokens
Grok 4.6 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

DeepSeek

40

Composite Score

Winner
Grok 4.6

xAI

89

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)Grok 4.6Winner
Overall Score
40
89
Grok 4.6
Rank#225#31
Grok 4.6
Quality Rank#225#31
Grok 4.6
Adoption Rank#225#31
Grok 4.6
Parameters------
Context Window1049K500K
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)
Pricing$1.32/$3.96/M$2.00/$6.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
67
100
Grok 4.6
Pricing
96
94
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)
Context window size
96
90
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)
Recency
100
100
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)
Output Capacity
96
90
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)
Benchmarks--
86
Grok 4.6
Benchmark Head-to-Head(11 benchmarks)
DeepSeek V4: 4Grok 4.6: 0
DeepSeek V4
Grok 4.6
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-91.5%
MMLU-Pro
87.5%83.5%
GPQA Diamond
90.1%82%
MATH-500
-95%
HumanEval
-95.5%
SWE-bench Verified
80.6%70%
AIME 2024
-88%
IFEval
-91%
BBH
-90%
Arena Elo
14631462
LiveBench
-73%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #225), placing it in the top 23% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.6Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #31), placing it in the top 90% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Grok 4.6 has a 49-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Grok 4.6 when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)
Input cost$1.32/M tokens
Output cost$3.96/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.132
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$79.20
Grok 4.6Best Value
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.090
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00

Grok 4.6 offers 34% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $79.20/month with DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) vs $120.00/month with Grok 4.6 - a $40.80 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)Faster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.6
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($3.96/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok 4.6

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Grok 4.6
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 clearly outperforms DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) with a significant 48.8-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 4.6 is the stronger choice. However, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) may still excel in niche scenarios.

by DeepSeek

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 34% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Grok 4.6
Recommended

by xAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)Grok 4.6
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)

DeepSeek

Best Value
$7.13
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.6

xAI

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) saves you $3.67/month

That's 34% cheaper than Grok 4.6 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch)Grok 4.6
Context Window1.0M500K
Max Output Tokens943,718450,000
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedAug 12, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Last updated: 17m ago

Related comparisons

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (batch) vs Grok 4.6 (2026) | LM Market Cap