Skip to content

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google

84#47
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGemini 2.5 ProDeltaGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
80
-12
92
Pricing
90
+2
88
Context window size
96
--
96
Recency
59
-41
100
Output Capacity
80
--
80
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
2 wins
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 2 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (24 data points)
Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 2.5 Pro

83.5

current score

Leader

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

right now

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

92.2

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google

Best Value
Per request$0.006250
Daily$20.83
Monthly$625.00
Annual$7500.00

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Google

Per request$0.008000
Daily$26.67
Monthly$800.00
Annual$9600.00

Gemini 2.5 Pro saves you $175.00/month

That's $2100.00/year compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

22% cheaper
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro for cost optimization

Gemini 2.5 Pro pricing:
Input:$1.25/M tokens
Output:$10.00/M tokens
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$12.00/M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google

84

Composite Score

Winner
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Google

92

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewWinner
Overall Score
84
92
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Rank#47#11
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Quality Rank#47#11
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Adoption Rank#47#11
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Parameters------
Context Window1049K1049K--
Pricing$1.25/$10.00/M$2.00/$12.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmarks
80
92
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Pricing
90
88
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context window size
96
96
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Recency
59
100
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Output Capacity
80
80
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
Gemini 2.5: 0Gemini 3.1: 5
Gemini 2.5
Gemini 3.1
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
90.8%92.6%
MMLU-Pro
86%91.2%
GPQA Diamond
84%94.3%
MATH-500
95.2%-
SWE-bench Verified
63.8%80.6%
AIME 2024
92%-
IFEval
87.2%-
BBH
88%-
Arena Elo
14441494
LiveBench
75.6%-
HLE
35.2%-
BigCodeBench
29.7%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Gemini 2.5 ProStrong Performer

Scores 84/100 (rank #47), placing it in the top 84% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewElite Tier

Scores 92/100 (rank #11), placing it in the top 97% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a 9-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Gemini 2.5 ProBest Value
Input cost$1.25/M tokens
Output cost$10.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.135
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$168.75
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$12.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.152
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$210.00

Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 20% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $168.75/month with Gemini 2.5 Pro vs $210.00/month with Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview - a $41.25 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Gemini 2.5 ProFaster
Speed score0/100
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Gemini 2.5 Pro also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($10.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (92/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a moderate advantage with a 8.700000000000003-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Gemini 2.5 Pro has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

by Google

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 20% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Google

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityGemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google

Best Value
$14.25
estimated monthly cost

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Google

$18.00
estimated monthly cost

Gemini 2.5 Pro saves you $3.75/month

That's 21% cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Max Output Tokens65,53665,536
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJun 17, 2025Feb 19, 2026
Last updated: 1m ago

Related comparisons

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (2026) | LM Market Cap