| Signal | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Delta | UI-TARS 7B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +67 | |
Pricing | 99 | -1 | |
Context window size | 96 | +14 | |
Recency | 100 | +20 | |
Output Capacity | 80 | +25 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 5 | 1 wins |
Score History
23.6
current score
UI-TARS 7B
right now
40
current score
ByteDance
UI-TARS 7B saves you $80.00/month
That's $960.00/year compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | UI-TARS 7B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 24 | 40 | UI-TARS 7B |
| Rank | #338 | #267 | UI-TARS 7B |
| Quality Rank | #338 | #267 | UI-TARS 7B |
| Adoption Rank | #338 | #267 | UI-TARS 7B |
| Parameters | -- | 7B | -- |
| Context Window | 1049K | 128K | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Pricing | $0.25/$1.50/M | $0.10/$0.20/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 33 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Pricing | 99 | 100 | UI-TARS 7B |
| Context window size | 96 | 81 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Recency | 100 | 80 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Output Capacity | 80 | 55 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 24/100 (rank #338), placing it in the top -16% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #267), placing it in the top 8% of all 290 models tracked.
UI-TARS 7B has a 16-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
UI-TARS 7B offers 83% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $4.50/month with UI-TARS 7B vs $26.25/month with Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite - a $21.75 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. UI-TARS 7B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
UI-TARS 7B clearly outperforms Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite with a significant 16.4-point lead. For most general use cases, UI-TARS 7B is the stronger choice. However, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
UI-TARS 7B
83% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Google
| Capability | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | UI-TARS 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
ByteDance
UI-TARS 7B saves you $1.83/month
That's 81% cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | UI-TARS 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | 65,536 | 2,048 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | May 7, 2026 | Jul 22, 2025 |