Gemini 4 Argon (batch) vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
| Signal | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) | Delta | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +17 | |
Pricing | 95 | -1 | |
Context window size | 96 | +10 | |
Recency | 100 | +15 | |
Output Capacity | 96 | +10 | |
Benchmarks | 0 | -70 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 2 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
right now
70.7
current score
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Alibaba
Qwen3.5 397B A17B saves you $120.00/month
That's $1440.00/year compared to Gemini 4 Argon (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 71 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Rank | #203 | #113 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Quality Rank | #203 | #113 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Adoption Rank | #203 | #113 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Parameters | -- | 397B | -- |
| Context Window | 1049K | 262K | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) |
| Pricing | $1.00/$5.00/M | $0.50/$3.60/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 83 | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) |
| Pricing | 95 | 96 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Context window size | 96 | 86 | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) |
| Recency | 100 | 85 | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) |
| Output Capacity | 96 | 86 | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) |
| Benchmarks | -- | 70 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #203), placing it in the top 30% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 71/100 (rank #113), placing it in the top 61% of all 290 models tracked.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 31-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Choose Gemini 4 Argon (batch) when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B when you need:
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Qwen3.5 397B A17B offers 32% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $61.50/month with Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs $90.00/month with Gemini 4 Argon (batch) - a $28.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Qwen3.5 397B A17B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($3.60/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (71/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Qwen3.5 397B A17B clearly outperforms Gemini 4 Argon (batch) with a significant 30.700000000000003-point lead. For most general use cases, Qwen3.5 397B A17B is the stronger choice. However, Gemini 4 Argon (batch) may still excel in niche scenarios.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
32% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Google
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Alibaba
Qwen3.5 397B A17B saves you $2.58/month
That's 33% cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Gemini 4 Argon (batch) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | 943,718 | 235,929 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Oct 13, 2026 | Feb 16, 2026 |