| Signal | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Delta | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | +17 | |
Benchmarks | 72 | +72 | |
Pricing | 100 | 0 | |
Context window size | 86 | +5 | |
Recency | 100 | +7 | |
Output Capacity | 90 | +70 | |
| Overall Result | 5 wins | of 6 | 1 wins |
Score History
73
current score
Gemma 4 26B A4B
right now
40
current score
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 saves you $20.00/month
That's $240.00/year compared to Gemma 4 26B A4B at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 73 | 40 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Rank | #67 | #230 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Quality Rank | #67 | #230 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Adoption Rank | #67 | #230 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Parameters | 26B | 9B | -- |
| Context Window | 262K | 131K | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Pricing | $0.12/$0.40/M | $0.04/$0.16/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 67 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Benchmarks | 72 | -- | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Pricing | 100 | 100 | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
| Context window size | 86 | 81 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Recency | 100 | 93 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Output Capacity | 90 | 20 | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 73/100 (rank #67), placing it in the top 77% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #230), placing it in the top 21% of all 290 models tracked.
Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 33-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 offers 62% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $3.00/month with Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs $7.80/month with Gemma 4 26B A4B - a $4.80 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.16/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (73/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Gemma 4 26B A4B clearly outperforms Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with a significant 33-point lead. For most general use cases, Gemma 4 26B A4B is the stronger choice. However, Nemotron Nano 9B V2 may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
62% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Google
| Capability | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 saves you $0.4320/month
That's 62% cheaper than Gemma 4 26B A4B at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 262K | 131K |
| Max Output Tokens | 262,144 | -- |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Apr 3, 2026 | Sep 5, 2025 |