GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
| Signal | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) | Delta | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | -17 | |
Benchmarks | 70 | +70 | |
Pricing | 100 | +2 | |
Context window size | 96 | 0 | |
Recency | 29 | -71 | |
Output Capacity | 72 | -9 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
Score History
58.9
current score
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
right now
40
current score
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) saves you $160.00/month
That's $1920.00/year compared to GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 59 | 40 | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) |
| Rank | #162 | #181 | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) |
| Quality Rank | #162 | #181 | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) |
| Adoption Rank | #162 | #181 | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1048K | 1050K | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Pricing | $0.05/$0.20/M | $0.50/$2.50/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 100 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Benchmarks | 70 | -- | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) |
| Pricing | 100 | 98 | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) |
| Context window size | 96 | 96 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Recency | 29 | 100 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
| Output Capacity | 72 | 82 | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 59/100 (rank #162), placing it in the top 44% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #181), placing it in the top 38% of all 290 models tracked.
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) has a 19-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Choose GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
Choose GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) when you need:
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) offers 92% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $3.75/month with GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs $45.00/month with GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) - a $41.25 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1050K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (59/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) clearly outperforms GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) with a significant 18.9-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) is the stronger choice. However, GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) may still excel in niche scenarios.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
92% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 92% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) saves you $3.57/month
That's 92% cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 32,768 | 128,000 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Apr 14, 2025 | Oct 26, 2026 |