Skip to content

GPT-4.1 vs o3

GPT-4.1

OpenAI

68#127
vs
o3

OpenAI

87#43
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-4.1Deltao3
Capabilities
83
-17
100
Benchmarks
70
-18
88
Pricing
92
--
92
Context window size
96
+11
84
Recency
47
0
48
Output Capacity
75
-8
83
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
4 wins
o3 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (24 data points)
GPT-4.1o3
GPT-4.1

67.7

current score

Leader

o3

right now

o3

86.7

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-4.1

OpenAI

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

o3

OpenAI

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00
GPT-4.1 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
o3 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
GPT-4.1

OpenAI

68

Composite Score

Winner
o3

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-4.1o3Winner
Overall Score
68
87
o3
Rank#127#43
o3
Quality Rank#127#43
o3
Adoption Rank#127#43
o3
Parameters------
Context Window1048K200K
GPT-4.1
Pricing$2.00/$8.00/M$2.00/$8.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
100
o3
Benchmarks
70
88
o3
Pricing
92
92
GPT-4.1
Context window size
96
84
GPT-4.1
Recency
47
48
o3
Output Capacity
75
83
o3
Benchmark Head-to-Head(13 benchmarks)
GPT-4.1: 0o3: 11
GPT-4.1
o3
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
89.2%92.3%
MMLU-Pro
81.8%85.8%
GPQA Diamond
56%87.7%
MATH-500
78.5%99%
HumanEval
91.5%97%
SWE-bench Verified
54.6%71.7%
AIME 2024
-96.7%
IFEval
88.2%92%
BBH
84%93%
Arena Elo
13001415
LiveBench
64.5%74.8%
HLE
5.4%30.1%
BigCodeBench
31.8%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-4.1Competitive

Scores 68/100 (rank #127), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
o3Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #43), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

o3 has a 19-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-4.1 when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1048K token context)

Choose o3 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-4.1
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.148
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00
o3Best Value
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.115
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
GPT-4.1Faster
Speed score0/100
o3
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-4.1

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GPT-4.1 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-4.1

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1048K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

GPT-4.1

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($8.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

GPT-4.1

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (87/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-4.1
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3

o3 clearly outperforms GPT-4.1 with a significant 19-point lead. For most general use cases, o3 is the stronger choice. However, GPT-4.1 may still excel in niche scenarios.

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 0% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
o3
Recommended

by OpenAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-4.1o3
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-4.1

OpenAI

$13.20
estimated monthly cost

o3

OpenAI

$13.20
estimated monthly cost

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-4.1o3
Context Window1.0M200K
Max Output Tokens32,768100,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedApr 14, 2025Apr 16, 2025
Last updated: 53m ago

Related comparisons

GPT-4.1 vs o3 (2026) | LM Market Cap