GPT-4.1 vs GLM 5.2
| Signal | GPT-4.1 | Delta | GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | +17 | |
Benchmarks | 70 | -10 | |
Pricing | 92 | -6 | |
Context window size | 96 | -- | |
Recency | 47 | -53 | |
Output Capacity | 75 | -10 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
Score History
67.7
current score
GLM 5.2
right now
78.5
current score
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
GLM 5.2
Zhipu AI
GLM 5.2 saves you $411.00/month
That's $4932.00/year compared to GPT-4.1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 | GLM 5.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68 | 79 | GLM 5.2 |
| Rank | #127 | #68 | GLM 5.2 |
| Quality Rank | #127 | #68 | GLM 5.2 |
| Adoption Rank | #127 | #68 | GLM 5.2 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1048K | 1049K | GLM 5.2 |
| Pricing | $2.00/$8.00/M | $0.73/$2.31/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 67 | GPT-4.1 |
| Benchmarks | 70 | 81 | GLM 5.2 |
| Pricing | 92 | 98 | GLM 5.2 |
| Context window size | 96 | 96 | GPT-4.1 |
| Recency | 47 | 100 | GLM 5.2 |
| Output Capacity | 75 | 85 | GLM 5.2 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 68/100 (rank #127), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 79/100 (rank #68), placing it in the top 77% of all 290 models tracked.
GLM 5.2 has a 11-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Choose GPT-4.1 when you need:
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
Choose GLM 5.2 when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
GLM 5.2 offers 70% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $45.67/month with GLM 5.2 vs $150.00/month with GPT-4.1 - a $104.33 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GLM 5.2 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.31/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (79/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GLM 5.2 clearly outperforms GPT-4.1 with a significant 10.799999999999997-point lead. For most general use cases, GLM 5.2 is the stronger choice. However, GPT-4.1 may still excel in niche scenarios.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT-4.1
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GLM 5.2
70% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4.1
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4.1
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4.1
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT-4.1 | GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
GLM 5.2
Zhipu AI
GLM 5.2 saves you $9.11/month
That's 69% cheaper than GPT-4.1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4.1 | GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 32,768 | 131,072 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Apr 14, 2025 | Jun 16, 2026 |