Skip to content

GPT-4o vs R1 0528

GPT-4o

OpenAI

71#110
vs
R1 0528

DeepSeek

79#84
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-4oDeltaR1 0528
Capabilities
67
--
67
Benchmarks
74
-6
81
Pricing
90
-8
98
Context window size
81
-2
83
Recency
0
-37
37
Output Capacity
67
-5
72
Overall Result
0 wins
of 6
5 wins
R1 0528 wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (38 data points)
GPT-4oR1 0528
GPT-4o

71.2

current score

Leader

R1 0528

right now

R1 0528

79.4

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-4o

OpenAI

Per request$0.007500
Daily$25.00
Monthly$750.00
Annual$9000.00

R1 0528

DeepSeek

Best Value
Per request$0.001575
Daily$5.25
Monthly$157.50
Annual$1890.00

R1 0528 saves you $592.50/month

That's $7110.00/year compared to GPT-4o at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

79% cheaper
Choose R1 0528 for cost optimization

GPT-4o pricing:
Input:$2.50/M tokens
Output:$10.00/M tokens
R1 0528 pricing:
Input:$0.50/M tokens
Output:$2.15/M tokens
GPT-4o

OpenAI

71

Composite Score

Winner
R1 0528

DeepSeek

79

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-4oR1 0528Winner
Overall Score
71
79
R1 0528
Rank#110#84
R1 0528
Quality Rank#110#84
R1 0528
Adoption Rank#110#84
R1 0528
Parameters------
Context Window128K164K
R1 0528
Pricing$2.50/$10.00/M$0.50/$2.15/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
67
67
GPT-4o
Benchmarks
74
81
R1 0528
Pricing
90
98
R1 0528
Context window size
81
83
R1 0528
Recency
0
37
R1 0528
Output Capacity
67
72
R1 0528
Benchmark Head-to-Head(16 benchmarks)
GPT-4o: 0R1 0528: 9
GPT-4o
R1 0528
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
88.7%91.5%
MMLU-Pro
72.6%83.4%
GPQA Diamond
53.6%76%
MATH-500
76.6%97.8%
HumanEval
90.2%-
SWE-bench Verified
30.8%57.6%
AIME 2024
-84%
GSM8K
95.8%-
IFEval
84.3%85.5%
BBH
83.7%86.5%
ARC-Challenge
96.4%-
HellaSwag
95.3%-
Arena Elo
12861380
LiveBench
64.3%69.5%
BigCodeBench
51.1%-
SimpleQA
38.2%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-4oStrong Performer

Scores 71/100 (rank #110), placing it in the top 62% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
R1 0528Strong Performer

Scores 79/100 (rank #84), placing it in the top 71% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

R1 0528 has a 8-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-4o when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding

Choose R1 0528 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-4o
Input cost$2.50/M tokens
Output cost$10.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.176
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$187.50
R1 0528Best Value
Input cost$0.50/M tokens
Output cost$2.15/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.033
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$39.75

R1 0528 offers 79% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $39.75/month with R1 0528 vs $187.50/month with GPT-4o - a $147.75 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
GPT-4oFaster
Speed score0/100
R1 0528
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-4o

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. R1 0528 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-4o

Long document analysis

Larger context window (164K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

R1 0528

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.15/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

R1 0528

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (79/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

R1 0528

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-4o
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
R1 0528

R1 0528 has a moderate advantage with a 8.200000000000003-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but GPT-4o has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
R1 0528
Recommended

by DeepSeek

  • Choose for Cost - 79% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-4oR1 0528
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-4o

OpenAI

$16.50
estimated monthly cost

R1 0528

DeepSeek

Best Value
$3.48
estimated monthly cost

R1 0528 saves you $13.02/month

That's 79% cheaper than GPT-4o at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-4oR1 0528
Context Window128K164K
Max Output Tokens16,38432,768
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedMay 13, 2024May 28, 2025
Last updated: 42m ago

Related comparisons

GPT-4o vs R1 0528 (2026) | LM Market Cap