Skip to content

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-5.2 Pro (batch)DeltaQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Capabilities
100
+17
83
Benchmarks
89
+89
0
Pricing
16
-82
98
Context window size
89
-6
95
Recency
89
-11
100
Output Capacity
85
+5
80
Overall Result
3 wins
of 6
3 wins
It's a tie - both models win 3 signals each

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

90.5

current score

Leader

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

right now

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

68.2

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

OpenAI

Per request$0.052500
Daily$175.00
Monthly$5250.00
Annual$63000.00

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Alibaba

Best Value
Per request$0.001040
Daily$3.47
Monthly$104.00
Annual$1248.00

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 saves you $5146.00/month

That's $61752.00/year compared to GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

98% cheaper
Choose Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for cost optimization

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) pricing:
Input:$10.50/M tokens
Output:$84.00/M tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 pricing:
Input:$0.26/M tokens
Output:$1.56/M tokens
Winner
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

OpenAI

91

Composite Score

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Alibaba

68

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-5.2 Pro (batch)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Winner
Overall Score
91
68
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Rank#27#171
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Quality Rank#27#171
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Adoption Rank#27#171
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Parameters------
Context Window400K1000K
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Pricing$10.50/$84.00/M$0.26/$1.56/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
83
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Benchmarks
89
--
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Pricing
16
98
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Context window size
89
95
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Recency
89
100
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Output Capacity
85
80
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Benchmark Head-to-Head(11 benchmarks)
GPT-5.2 Pro: 0Qwen3.5 Plus: 0
GPT-5.2 Pro
Qwen3.5 Plus
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
93.5%-
MMLU-Pro
86%-
GPQA Diamond
87%-
MATH-500
94%-
HumanEval
97%-
SWE-bench Verified
78%-
IFEval
93%-
BBH
91.5%-
Arena Elo
1481-
LiveBench
77.5%-
HLE
37%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)Elite Tier

Scores 91/100 (rank #27), placing it in the top 91% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Competitive

Scores 68/100 (rank #171), placing it in the top 41% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) has a 22-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Input cost$10.50/M tokens
Output cost$84.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$1.044
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$1417.50
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Best Value
Input cost$0.26/M tokens
Output cost$1.56/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.027
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$27.30

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 offers 98% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $27.30/month with Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs $1417.50/month with GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) - a $1390.20 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)Faster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($1.56/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (91/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) clearly outperforms Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 with a significant 22.299999999999997-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) is the stronger choice. However, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 may still excel in niche scenarios.

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Alibaba

  • Choose for Cost - 98% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-5.2 Pro (batch)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)

OpenAI

$119.70
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Alibaba

Best Value
$2.34
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 saves you $117.36/month

That's 98% cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-5.2 Pro (batch)Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Context Window400K1M
Max Output Tokens128,00065,536
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedDec 10, 2025Feb 16, 2026
Last updated: 10m ago

Related comparisons

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (2026) | LM Market Cap