GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.7 Max
| Signal | GPT-5.4 Nano | Delta | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +33 | |
Benchmarks | 90 | +90 | |
Pricing | 99 | +3 | |
Context window size | 80 | -6 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 85 | +5 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 1 wins |
Score History
78.8
current score
GPT-5.4 Nano
right now
40
current score
GPT-5.4 Nano
OpenAI
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba
GPT-5.4 Nano saves you $230.00/month
That's $2760.00/year compared to Qwen3.7 Max at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen3.7 Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 79 | 40 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Rank | #50 | #185 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Quality Rank | #50 | #185 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Adoption Rank | #50 | #185 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 1000K | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Pricing | $0.20/$1.25/M | $1.25/$3.75/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 67 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Benchmarks | 90 | -- | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Pricing | 99 | 96 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Context window size | 80 | 86 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 80 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 79/100 (rank #50), placing it in the top 83% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #185), placing it in the top 37% of all 290 models tracked.
GPT-5.4 Nano has a 39-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Choose GPT-5.4 Nano when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Choose Qwen3.7 Max when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
GPT-5.4 Nano offers 71% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $21.75/month with GPT-5.4 Nano vs $75.00/month with Qwen3.7 Max - a $53.25 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GPT-5.4 Nano also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($1.25/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (79/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-5.4 Nano clearly outperforms Qwen3.7 Max with a significant 38.8-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-5.4 Nano is the stronger choice. However, Qwen3.7 Max may still excel in niche scenarios.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT-5.4 Nano
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.4 Nano
71% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.4 Nano
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.4 Nano
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.4 Nano
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 71% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
GPT-5.4 Nano
OpenAI
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba
GPT-5.4 Nano saves you $4.89/month
That's 72% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 400K | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 128,000 | 65,536 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Mar 17, 2026 | May 21, 2026 |