GPT-5.4 Nano vs GLM 5.1
| Signal | GPT-5.4 Nano | Delta | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +33 | |
Benchmarks | 90 | +14 | |
Pricing | 99 | +2 | |
Context window size | 80 | +4 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 85 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
Score History
78.8
current score
GPT-5.4 Nano
right now
75.8
current score
GPT-5.4 Nano
OpenAI
GLM 5.1
Zhipu AI
GPT-5.4 Nano saves you $165.90/month
That's $1990.80/year compared to GLM 5.1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Nano | GLM 5.1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 79 | 76 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Rank | #50 | #65 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Quality Rank | #50 | #65 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Adoption Rank | #50 | #65 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 203K | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Pricing | $0.20/$1.25/M | $0.97/$3.04/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 67 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Benchmarks | 90 | 76 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Pricing | 99 | 97 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Context window size | 80 | 76 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 85 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 79/100 (rank #50), placing it in the top 83% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 76/100 (rank #65), placing it in the top 78% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 3-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose GPT-5.4 Nano when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Processing long documents or large codebases (400K token context)
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Choose GLM 5.1 when you need:
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
GPT-5.4 Nano offers 64% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $21.75/month with GPT-5.4 Nano vs $60.03/month with GLM 5.1 - a $38.28 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GPT-5.4 Nano also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (400K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($1.25/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (79/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-5.4 Nano and GLM 5.1 are extremely close in overall performance (only 3 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT-5.4 Nano
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.4 Nano
64% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.4 Nano
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.4 Nano
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.4 Nano
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 64% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT-5.4 Nano | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
GPT-5.4 Nano
OpenAI
GLM 5.1
Zhipu AI
GPT-5.4 Nano saves you $3.52/month
That's 65% cheaper than GLM 5.1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-5.4 Nano | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 400K | 203K |
| Max Output Tokens | 128,000 | 128,000 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Mar 17, 2026 | Apr 7, 2026 |