Skip to content

GPT-5.5 vs o3

GPT-5.5

OpenAI

93#9
vs
o3

OpenAI

87#43
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-5.5Deltao3
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
93
+4
88
Pricing
70
-22
92
Context window size
96
+12
84
Recency
100
+52
48
Output Capacity
85
+2
83
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
1 wins
GPT-5.5 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (24 data points)
GPT-5.5o3
GPT-5.5

92.7

current score

Leader

GPT-5.5

right now

o3

86.7

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-5.5

OpenAI

Per request$0.020000
Daily$66.67
Monthly$2000.00
Annual$24000.00

o3

OpenAI

Best Value
Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

o3 saves you $1400.00/month

That's $16800.00/year compared to GPT-5.5 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

70% cheaper
Choose o3 for cost optimization

GPT-5.5 pricing:
Input:$5.00/M tokens
Output:$30.00/M tokens
o3 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
Winner
GPT-5.5

OpenAI

93

Composite Score

o3

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-5.5o3Winner
Overall Score
93
87
GPT-5.5
Rank#9#43
GPT-5.5
Quality Rank#9#43
GPT-5.5
Adoption Rank#9#43
GPT-5.5
Parameters------
Context Window1050K200K
GPT-5.5
Pricing$5.00/$30.00/M$2.00/$8.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
GPT-5.5
Benchmarks
93
88
GPT-5.5
Pricing
70
92
o3
Context window size
96
84
GPT-5.5
Recency
100
48
GPT-5.5
Output Capacity
85
83
GPT-5.5
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
GPT-5.5: 5o3: 0
GPT-5.5
o3
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
92.4%92.3%
MMLU-Pro
-85.8%
GPQA Diamond
93.6%87.7%
MATH-500
-99%
HumanEval
-97%
SWE-bench Verified
88.7%71.7%
AIME 2024
-96.7%
IFEval
-92%
BBH
-93%
Arena Elo
14751415
LiveBench
-74.8%
HLE
41.4%30.1%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-5.5Elite Tier

Scores 93/100 (rank #9), placing it in the top 97% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
o3Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #43), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

GPT-5.5 has a 6-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-5.5 when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1050K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose o3 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-5.5
Input cost$5.00/M tokens
Output cost$30.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.378
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$525.00
o3Best Value
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.115
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00

o3 offers 71% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $150.00/month with o3 vs $525.00/month with GPT-5.5 - a $375.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
GPT-5.5Faster
Speed score0/100
o3
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-5.5

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. o3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-5.5

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1050K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

GPT-5.5

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($8.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

o3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (93/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GPT-5.5

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-5.5
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 has a moderate advantage with a 6-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but o3 has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

GPT-5.5
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Cost - 71% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-5.5o3
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-5.5

OpenAI

$45.00
estimated monthly cost

o3

OpenAI

Best Value
$13.20
estimated monthly cost

o3 saves you $31.80/month

That's 71% cheaper than GPT-5.5 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-5.5o3
Context Window1.1M200K
Max Output Tokens128,000100,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedApr 24, 2026Apr 16, 2025
Last updated: 53m ago

Related comparisons

GPT-5.5 vs o3 (2026) | LM Market Cap