Skip to content

GPT-6 Luna vs GLM Latest

GPT-6 Luna

OpenAI

40#253
vs
GLM Latest

~z-ai

40#287
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-6 LunaDeltaGLM Latest
Capabilities
100
+33
67
Pricing
100
+12
88
Context window size
96
+0
96
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
82
0
82
Overall Result
3 wins
of 5
1 wins
GPT-6 Luna wins 3 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (8 data points)
GPT-6 LunaGLM Latest
GPT-6 Luna

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

GLM Latest

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-6 Luna

OpenAI

Best Value
Per request$0.000350
Daily$1.17
Monthly$35.00
Annual$420.00

GLM Latest

~z-ai

Per request$0.006030
Daily$20.10
Monthly$603.00
Annual$7236.00

GPT-6 Luna saves you $568.00/month

That's $6816.00/year compared to GLM Latest at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

94% cheaper
Choose GPT-6 Luna for cost optimization

GPT-6 Luna pricing:
Input:$0.10/M tokens
Output:$0.50/M tokens
GLM Latest pricing:
Input:$0.03/M tokens
Output:$12.00/M tokens
Tie
GPT-6 Luna

OpenAI

40

Composite Score

Tie
GLM Latest

~z-ai

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-6 LunaGLM LatestWinner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#253#287
GPT-6 Luna
Quality Rank#253#287
GPT-6 Luna
Adoption Rank#253#287
GPT-6 Luna
Parameters------
Context Window1050K1049K
GPT-6 Luna
Pricing$0.10/$0.50/M$0.03/$12.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
67
GPT-6 Luna
Pricing
100
88
GPT-6 Luna
Context window size
96
96
GPT-6 Luna
Recency
100
100
GPT-6 Luna
Output Capacity
82
82
GLM Latest
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-6 LunaEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #253), placing it in the top 13% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
GLM LatestEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #287), placing it in the top 1% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-6 Luna when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose GLM Latest when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-6 LunaBest Value
Input cost$0.10/M tokens
Output cost$0.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.015
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$9.00
GLM Latest
Input cost$0.03/M tokens
Output cost$12.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.301
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$180.45

GPT-6 Luna offers 95% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $9.00/month with GPT-6 Luna vs $180.45/month with GLM Latest - a $171.45 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
GPT-6 LunaFaster
Speed score0/100
GLM Latest
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-6 Luna

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GPT-6 Luna also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-6 Luna

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1050K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

GPT-6 Luna

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

GPT-6 Luna

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GPT-6 Luna

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-6 Luna
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna and GLM Latest are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

GPT-6 Luna
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 95% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by ~z-ai

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-6 LunaGLM Latest
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-6 Luna

OpenAI

Best Value
$0.7800
estimated monthly cost

GLM Latest

~z-ai

$14.45
estimated monthly cost

GPT-6 Luna saves you $13.67/month

That's 95% cheaper than GLM Latest at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-6 LunaGLM Latest
Context Window1.1M1.0M
Max Output Tokens128,000131,072
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedSep 22, 2026Aug 19, 2026
Last updated: 38m ago

Related comparisons

GPT-6 Luna vs GLM Latest (2026) | LM Market Cap