GPT Chat Latest vs WizardLM-2 8x22B
| Signal | GPT Chat Latest | Delta | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | +50 | |
Pricing | 70 | -29 | |
Context window size | 89 | +13 | |
Recency | 100 | +100 | |
Output Capacity | 85 | +20 | |
Benchmarks | 0 | -31 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 2 wins |
Score History
40
current score
GPT Chat Latest
right now
28.8
current score
GPT Chat Latest
OpenAI
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Microsoft
WizardLM-2 8x22B saves you $1907.00/month
That's $22884.00/year compared to GPT Chat Latest at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT Chat Latest | WizardLM-2 8x22B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 29 | GPT Chat Latest |
| Rank | #263 | #372 | GPT Chat Latest |
| Quality Rank | #263 | #372 | GPT Chat Latest |
| Adoption Rank | #263 | #372 | GPT Chat Latest |
| Parameters | -- | 22B | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 66K | GPT Chat Latest |
| Pricing | $5.00/$30.00/M | $0.62/$0.62/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 33 | GPT Chat Latest |
| Pricing | 70 | 99 | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
| Context window size | 89 | 76 | GPT Chat Latest |
| Recency | 100 | 0 | GPT Chat Latest |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 65 | GPT Chat Latest |
| Benchmarks | -- | 31 | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #263), placing it in the top 10% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 29/100 (rank #372), placing it in the top -28% of all 290 models tracked.
GPT Chat Latest has a 11-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Choose GPT Chat Latest when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (400K token context)
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
- Agentic applications using tool/function calling
Choose WizardLM-2 8x22B when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
WizardLM-2 8x22B offers 96% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $18.60/month with WizardLM-2 8x22B vs $525.00/month with GPT Chat Latest - a $506.40 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. WizardLM-2 8x22B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (400K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.62/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT Chat Latest clearly outperforms WizardLM-2 8x22B with a significant 11.2-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT Chat Latest is the stronger choice. However, WizardLM-2 8x22B may still excel in niche scenarios.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT Chat Latest
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
WizardLM-2 8x22B
96% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT Chat Latest
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT Chat Latest
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT Chat Latest
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT Chat Latest | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
GPT Chat Latest
OpenAI
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Microsoft
WizardLM-2 8x22B saves you $43.14/month
That's 96% cheaper than GPT Chat Latest at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT Chat Latest | WizardLM-2 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 400K | 66K |
| Max Output Tokens | 128,000 | 8,000 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | May 5, 2026 | Apr 16, 2024 |