Skip to content

Grok Latest vs Muse Spark 1.3

Grok Latest

~x-ai

40#314
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGrok LatestDeltaMuse Spark 1.3
Capabilities
100
--
100
Pricing
94
-2
96
Context window size
90
-5
96
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
90
-5
96
Overall Result
0 wins
of 5
3 wins
Muse Spark 1.3 wins 3 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (14 data points)
Grok LatestMuse Spark 1.3
Grok Latest

40

current score

Leader

Muse Spark 1.3

right now

Muse Spark 1.3

80.7

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Grok Latest

~x-ai

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Muse Spark 1.3

meta

Best Value
Per request$0.003375
Daily$11.25
Monthly$337.50
Annual$4050.00

Muse Spark 1.3 saves you $162.50/month

That's $1950.00/year compared to Grok Latest at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

32% cheaper
Choose Muse Spark 1.3 for cost optimization

Grok Latest pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Muse Spark 1.3 pricing:
Input:$1.25/M tokens
Output:$4.25/M tokens
Grok Latest

~x-ai

40

Composite Score

Winner
Muse Spark 1.3

meta

81

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGrok LatestMuse Spark 1.3Winner
Overall Score
40
81
Muse Spark 1.3
Rank#314#84
Muse Spark 1.3
Quality Rank#314#84
Muse Spark 1.3
Adoption Rank#314#84
Muse Spark 1.3
Parameters------
Context Window500K1049K
Muse Spark 1.3
Pricing$2.00/$6.00/M$1.25/$4.25/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
Grok Latest
Pricing
94
96
Muse Spark 1.3
Context window size
90
96
Muse Spark 1.3
Recency
100
100
Grok Latest
Output Capacity
90
96
Muse Spark 1.3
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Grok LatestEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #314), placing it in the top -8% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Muse Spark 1.3Strong Performer

Scores 81/100 (rank #84), placing it in the top 71% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Muse Spark 1.3 has a 41-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Grok Latest when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Grok Latest
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.200
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00
Muse Spark 1.3Best Value
Input cost$1.25/M tokens
Output cost$4.25/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.068
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$82.50

Muse Spark 1.3 offers 31% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $82.50/month with Muse Spark 1.3 vs $120.00/month with Grok Latest - a $37.50 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Grok LatestFaster
Speed score0/100
Muse Spark 1.3
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Grok Latest

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Muse Spark 1.3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Grok Latest

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Muse Spark 1.3

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($4.25/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Muse Spark 1.3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (81/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Muse Spark 1.3

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Grok Latest
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 clearly outperforms Grok Latest with a significant 40.7-point lead. For most general use cases, Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger choice. However, Grok Latest may still excel in niche scenarios.

by ~x-ai

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Muse Spark 1.3
Recommended

by meta

  • Choose for Cost - 31% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGrok LatestMuse Spark 1.3
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Grok Latest

~x-ai

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Muse Spark 1.3

meta

Best Value
$7.35
estimated monthly cost

Muse Spark 1.3 saves you $3.45/month

That's 32% cheaper than Grok Latest at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGrok LatestMuse Spark 1.3
Context Window500K1.0M
Max Output Tokens450,000943,718
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJul 8, 2026Sep 2, 2026
Last updated: 20m ago

Related comparisons

Grok Latest vs Muse Spark 1.3 (2026) | LM Market Cap