Skip to content

Grok Latest vs Fugu Max

Grok Latest

~x-ai

40#309
vs
Fugu Max

sakana

40#266
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGrok LatestDeltaFugu Max
Capabilities
100
--
100
Pricing
95
+1
94
Context window size
90
-5
95
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
90
+9
82
Overall Result
2 wins
of 5
1 wins
Grok Latest wins 2 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (13 data points)
Grok LatestFugu Max
Grok Latest

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Fugu Max

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Grok Latest

~x-ai

Best Value
Per request$0.004000
Daily$13.33
Monthly$400.00
Annual$4800.00

Fugu Max

sakana

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Grok Latest saves you $100.00/month

That's $1200.00/year compared to Fugu Max at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

20% cheaper
Choose Grok Latest for cost optimization

Grok Latest pricing:
Input:$1.60/M tokens
Output:$4.80/M tokens
Fugu Max pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Tie
Grok Latest

~x-ai

40

Composite Score

Tie
Fugu Max

sakana

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGrok LatestFugu MaxWinner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#309#266
Fugu Max
Quality Rank#309#266
Fugu Max
Adoption Rank#309#266
Fugu Max
Parameters------
Context Window500K1000K
Fugu Max
Pricing$1.60/$4.80/M$2.00/$6.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
Grok Latest
Pricing
95
94
Grok Latest
Context window size
90
95
Fugu Max
Recency
100
100
Grok Latest
Output Capacity
90
82
Grok Latest
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Grok LatestEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #309), placing it in the top -6% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Fugu MaxEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #266), placing it in the top 9% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Grok Latest when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Fugu Max when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Grok LatestBest Value
Input cost$1.60/M tokens
Output cost$4.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.160
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$96.00
Fugu Max
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.200
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00

Grok Latest offers 20% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $96.00/month with Grok Latest vs $120.00/month with Fugu Max - a $24.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Grok LatestFaster
Speed score0/100
Fugu Max
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Grok Latest

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok Latest also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Grok Latest

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Fugu Max

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($4.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Grok Latest

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok Latest

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Grok Latest
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok Latest

Grok Latest and Fugu Max are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Grok Latest
Recommended

by ~x-ai

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 20% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by sakana

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityGrok LatestFugu Max
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Grok Latest

~x-ai

Best Value
$8.64
estimated monthly cost

Fugu Max

sakana

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Grok Latest saves you $2.16/month

That's 20% cheaper than Fugu Max at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGrok LatestFugu Max
Context Window500K1M
Max Output Tokens450,000128,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJul 8, 2026Sep 11, 2026
Last updated: 35m ago

Related comparisons

Grok Latest vs Fugu Max (2026) | LM Market Cap