| Signal | KAT-Coder-Pro V2 | Delta | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -33 | |
Pricing | 99 | -- | |
Context window size | 77 | -9 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 82 | -13 | |
Benchmarks | 0 | -73 | |
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
Score History
40
current score
MiniMax M3
right now
74.1
current score
Kuaishou
MiniMax
| Metric | KAT-Coder-Pro V2 | MiniMax M3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 74 | MiniMax M3 |
| Rank | #205 | #73 | MiniMax M3 |
| Quality Rank | #205 | #73 | MiniMax M3 |
| Adoption Rank | #205 | #73 | MiniMax M3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 256K | 1049K | MiniMax M3 |
| Pricing | $0.30/$1.20/M | $0.30/$1.20/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 83 | MiniMax M3 |
| Pricing | 99 | 99 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2 |
| Context window size | 77 | 86 | MiniMax M3 |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2 |
| Output Capacity | 82 | 95 | MiniMax M3 |
| Benchmarks | -- | 73 | MiniMax M3 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #205), placing it in the top 30% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 74/100 (rank #73), placing it in the top 75% of all 290 models tracked.
MiniMax M3 has a 34-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. KAT-Coder-Pro V2 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($1.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (74/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
MiniMax M3 clearly outperforms KAT-Coder-Pro V2 with a significant 34.099999999999994-point lead. For most general use cases, MiniMax M3 is the stronger choice. However, KAT-Coder-Pro V2 may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
KAT-Coder-Pro V2
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
KAT-Coder-Pro V2
0% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
KAT-Coder-Pro V2
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
KAT-Coder-Pro V2
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
KAT-Coder-Pro V2
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Kuaishou
| Capability | KAT-Coder-Pro V2 | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Kuaishou
MiniMax
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | KAT-Coder-Pro V2 | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 256K | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 80,000 | 512,000 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Mar 27, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |