MiniMax M1 vs Fugu Max
| Signal | MiniMax M1 | Delta | Fugu Max |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -50 | |
Benchmarks | 71 | +71 | |
Pricing | 98 | +4 | |
Context window size | 95 | -- | |
Recency | 49 | -51 | |
Output Capacity | 74 | -8 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
Score History
70.8
current score
MiniMax M1
right now
40
current score
MiniMax M1
MiniMax
Fugu Max
sakana
MiniMax M1 saves you $350.00/month
That's $4200.00/year compared to Fugu Max at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | MiniMax M1 | Fugu Max | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 71 | 40 | MiniMax M1 |
| Rank | #163 | #256 | MiniMax M1 |
| Quality Rank | #163 | #256 | MiniMax M1 |
| Adoption Rank | #163 | #256 | MiniMax M1 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1000K | 1000K | -- |
| Pricing | $0.40/$2.20/M | $2.00/$6.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 100 | Fugu Max |
| Benchmarks | 71 | -- | MiniMax M1 |
| Pricing | 98 | 94 | MiniMax M1 |
| Context window size | 95 | 95 | MiniMax M1 |
| Recency | 49 | 100 | Fugu Max |
| Output Capacity | 74 | 82 | Fugu Max |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 71/100 (rank #163), placing it in the top 44% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #256), placing it in the top 12% of all 290 models tracked.
MiniMax M1 has a 31-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Choose MiniMax M1 when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Choose Fugu Max when you need:
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
MiniMax M1 offers 68% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $39.00/month with MiniMax M1 vs $120.00/month with Fugu Max - a $81.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. MiniMax M1 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (71/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
MiniMax M1 clearly outperforms Fugu Max with a significant 30.799999999999997-point lead. For most general use cases, MiniMax M1 is the stronger choice. However, Fugu Max may still excel in niche scenarios.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
MiniMax M1
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
MiniMax M1
68% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
MiniMax M1
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
MiniMax M1
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
MiniMax M1
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by MiniMax
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 68% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | MiniMax M1 | Fugu Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
MiniMax M1
MiniMax
Fugu Max
sakana
MiniMax M1 saves you $7.44/month
That's 69% cheaper than Fugu Max at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | MiniMax M1 | Fugu Max |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 40,000 | 128,000 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Jun 17, 2025 | Sep 11, 2026 |