Skip to content

Kimi K2 0905 vs o3

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

52#170
vs
o3

OpenAI

87#43
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalKimi K2 0905Deltao3
Capabilities
50
-50
100
Benchmarks
51
-38
88
Pricing
98
+6
92
Context window size
86
+2
84
Recency
73
+26
48
Output Capacity
83
+0
83
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
2 wins
Kimi K2 0905 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (24 data points)
Kimi K2 0905o3
Kimi K2 0905

52.4

current score

Leader

o3

right now

o3

86.7

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

Best Value
Per request$0.001850
Daily$6.17
Monthly$185.00
Annual$2220.00

o3

OpenAI

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

Kimi K2 0905 saves you $415.00/month

That's $4980.00/year compared to o3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

69% cheaper
Choose Kimi K2 0905 for cost optimization

Kimi K2 0905 pricing:
Input:$0.60/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
o3 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

52

Composite Score

Winner
o3

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricKimi K2 0905o3Winner
Overall Score
52
87
o3
Rank#170#43
o3
Quality Rank#170#43
o3
Adoption Rank#170#43
o3
Parameters------
Context Window262K200K
Kimi K2 0905
Pricing$0.60/$2.50/M$2.00/$8.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
100
o3
Benchmarks
51
88
o3
Pricing
98
92
Kimi K2 0905
Context window size
86
84
Kimi K2 0905
Recency
73
48
Kimi K2 0905
Output Capacity
83
83
Kimi K2 0905
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
Kimi K2: 0o3: 1
Kimi K2
o3
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-92.3%
MMLU-Pro
-85.8%
GPQA Diamond
-87.7%
MATH-500
-99%
HumanEval
-97%
SWE-bench Verified
63.4%71.7%
AIME 2024
-96.7%
IFEval
-92%
BBH
-93%
Arena Elo
-1415
LiveBench
-74.8%
HLE
-30.1%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Kimi K2 0905Competitive

Scores 52/100 (rank #170), placing it in the top 42% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
o3Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #43), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

o3 has a 34-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Kimi K2 0905 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose o3 when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Kimi K2 0905Best Value
Input cost$0.60/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.059
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$46.50
o3
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.115
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00

Kimi K2 0905 offers 69% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $46.50/month with Kimi K2 0905 vs $150.00/month with o3 - a $103.50 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Kimi K2 0905Faster
Speed score0/100
o3
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Kimi K2 0905

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Kimi K2 0905 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Kimi K2 0905

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Kimi K2 0905

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Kimi K2 0905

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (87/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o3
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3

o3 clearly outperforms Kimi K2 0905 with a significant 34.300000000000004-point lead. For most general use cases, o3 is the stronger choice. However, Kimi K2 0905 may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Moonshot AI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 69% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
o3
Recommended

by OpenAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityKimi K2 0905o3
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

Best Value
$4.08
estimated monthly cost

o3

OpenAI

$13.20
estimated monthly cost

Kimi K2 0905 saves you $9.12/month

That's 69% cheaper than o3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterKimi K2 0905o3
Context Window262K200K
Max Output Tokens100,352100,000
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedSep 4, 2025Apr 16, 2025
Last updated: 56m ago

Related comparisons

Kimi K2 0905 vs o3 (2026) | LM Market Cap