Skip to content

Kimi K2 0905 vs GLM 5

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

40#385
vs
GLM 5

Zhipu AI

68#141
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalKimi K2 0905DeltaGLM 5
Capabilities
50
-17
67
Pricing
98
+1
97
Context window size
86
+2
84
Recency
57
-29
86
Output Capacity
80
-2
82
Benchmarks
0
-69
69
Overall Result
2 wins
of 6
4 wins
GLM 5 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (37 data points)
Kimi K2 0905GLM 5
Kimi K2 0905

40

current score

Leader

GLM 5

right now

GLM 5

68.3

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

Best Value
Per request$0.001850
Daily$6.17
Monthly$185.00
Annual$2220.00

GLM 5

Zhipu AI

Per request$0.002600
Daily$8.67
Monthly$260.00
Annual$3120.00

Kimi K2 0905 saves you $75.00/month

That's $900.00/year compared to GLM 5 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

29% cheaper
Choose Kimi K2 0905 for cost optimization

Kimi K2 0905 pricing:
Input:$0.60/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
GLM 5 pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$3.20/M tokens
Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

40

Composite Score

Winner
GLM 5

Zhipu AI

68

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricKimi K2 0905GLM 5Winner
Overall Score
40
68
GLM 5
Rank#385#141
GLM 5
Quality Rank#385#141
GLM 5
Adoption Rank#385#141
GLM 5
Parameters------
Context Window262K205K
Kimi K2 0905
Pricing$0.60/$2.50/M$1.00/$3.20/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
67
GLM 5
Pricing
98
97
Kimi K2 0905
Context window size
86
84
Kimi K2 0905
Recency
57
86
GLM 5
Output Capacity
80
82
GLM 5
Benchmarks--
69
GLM 5
Benchmark Head-to-Head(1 benchmarks)
Kimi K2: 0GLM 5: 0
Kimi K2
GLM 5
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU-Pro
-86%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Kimi K2 0905Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #385), placing it in the top -32% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
GLM 5Competitive

Scores 68/100 (rank #141), placing it in the top 52% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

GLM 5 has a 28-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Kimi K2 0905 when you need:

  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose GLM 5 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Kimi K2 0905
Input cost$0.60/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.077
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$46.50
GLM 5Best Value
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$3.20/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.061
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$63.00

GLM 5 offers 26% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $46.50/month with Kimi K2 0905 vs $63.00/month with GLM 5 - a $16.50 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Kimi K2 0905Faster
Speed score0/100
GLM 5
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Kimi K2 0905

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Kimi K2 0905 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Kimi K2 0905

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Kimi K2 0905

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Kimi K2 0905

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (68/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GLM 5
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GLM 5

GLM 5 clearly outperforms Kimi K2 0905 with a significant 28.299999999999997-point lead. For most general use cases, GLM 5 is the stronger choice. However, Kimi K2 0905 may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Moonshot AI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 26% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
GLM 5
Recommended

by Zhipu AI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityKimi K2 0905GLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Kimi K2 0905

Moonshot AI

Best Value
$4.08
estimated monthly cost

GLM 5

Zhipu AI

$5.64
estimated monthly cost

Kimi K2 0905 saves you $1.56/month

That's 28% cheaper than GLM 5 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterKimi K2 0905GLM 5
Context Window262K205K
Max Output Tokens98,304131,072
Open SourceYesYes
CreatedSep 4, 2025Feb 11, 2026
Last updated: 35m ago

Related comparisons

Kimi K2 0905 vs GLM 5 (2026) | LM Market Cap