Skip to content

Gemma 3n 4B vs Nova Micro 1.0

Gemma 3n 4B

Google

40#333
vs
Nova Micro 1.0

Amazon

40#355
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGemma 3n 4BDeltaNova Micro 1.0
Capabilities
33
--
33
Pricing
100
--
100
Context window size
72
-9
81
Recency
52
+30
22
Output Capacity
20
-42
62
Overall Result
1 wins
of 5
2 wins
Nova Micro 1.0 wins 2 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
Gemma 3n 4BNova Micro 1.0
Gemma 3n 4B

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Nova Micro 1.0

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Gemma 3n 4B

Google

Per request$0.000120
Daily$0.40
Monthly$12.00
Annual$144.00

Nova Micro 1.0

Amazon

Best Value
Per request$0.000105
Daily$0.35
Monthly$10.50
Annual$126.00

Nova Micro 1.0 saves you $1.50/month

That's $18.00/year compared to Gemma 3n 4B at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

13% cheaper
Choose Nova Micro 1.0 for cost optimization

Gemma 3n 4B pricing:
Input:$0.06/M tokens
Output:$0.12/M tokens
Nova Micro 1.0 pricing:
Input:$0.04/M tokens
Output:$0.14/M tokens
Tie
Gemma 3n 4B

Google

40

Composite Score

Tie
Nova Micro 1.0

Amazon

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGemma 3n 4BNova Micro 1.0Winner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#333#355
Gemma 3n 4B
Quality Rank#333#355
Gemma 3n 4B
Adoption Rank#333#355
Gemma 3n 4B
Parameters4B----
Context Window33K128K
Nova Micro 1.0
Pricing$0.06/$0.12/M$0.04/$0.14/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
33
33
Gemma 3n 4B
Pricing
100
100
Gemma 3n 4B
Context window size
72
81
Nova Micro 1.0
Recency
52
22
Gemma 3n 4B
Output Capacity
20
62
Nova Micro 1.0
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Gemma 3n 4BEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #333), placing it in the top -14% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Nova Micro 1.0Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #355), placing it in the top -22% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Gemma 3n 4B when you need:

  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Nova Micro 1.0 when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (128K token context)
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
Cost-Performance Analysis
Gemma 3n 4B
Input cost$0.06/M tokens
Output cost$0.12/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.004
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$2.70
Nova Micro 1.0Best Value
Input cost$0.04/M tokens
Output cost$0.14/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.004
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$2.63

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
Gemma 3n 4BFaster
Speed score0/100
Nova Micro 1.0
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Gemma 3n 4B

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Gemma 3n 4B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Gemma 3n 4B

Long document analysis

Larger context window (128K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Nova Micro 1.0

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.12/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Gemma 3n 4B

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Gemma 3n 4B
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Gemma 3n 4B

Gemma 3n 4B and Nova Micro 1.0 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Gemma 3n 4B
Recommended

by Google

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Amazon

  • Choose for Cost - 3% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGemma 3n 4BNova Micro 1.0
Vision (Image Input)
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Gemma 3n 4B

Google

$0.2520
estimated monthly cost

Nova Micro 1.0

Amazon

Best Value
$0.2310
estimated monthly cost

Nova Micro 1.0 saves you $0.0210/month

That's 8% cheaper than Gemma 3n 4B at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGemma 3n 4BNova Micro 1.0
Context Window33K128K
Max Output Tokens--5,120
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedMay 20, 2025Dec 5, 2024
Last updated: 39m ago

Related comparisons

Gemma 3n 4B vs Nova Micro 1.0 (2026) | LM Market Cap