| Signal | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Delta | o3 Mini High |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 62 | +0 | |
Pricing | 96 | +0 | |
Context window size | 84 | -- | |
Recency | 38 | -18 | |
Output Capacity | 65 | -18 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 2 wins |
Score History
57.9
current score
o3 Mini High
right now
63.1
current score
Anthropic
OpenAI
Claude 3.5 Haiku saves you $50.00/month
That's $600.00/year compared to o3 Mini High at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Claude 3.5 Haiku | o3 Mini High | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 58 | 63 | o3 Mini High |
| Rank | #142 | #125 | o3 Mini High |
| Quality Rank | #142 | #125 | o3 Mini High |
| Adoption Rank | #142 | #125 | o3 Mini High |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 200K | 200K | -- |
| Pricing | $0.80/$4.00/M | $1.10/$4.40/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 67 | Claude 3.5 Haiku |
| Benchmarks | 62 | 62 | Claude 3.5 Haiku |
| Pricing | 96 | 96 | Claude 3.5 Haiku |
| Context window size | 84 | 84 | Claude 3.5 Haiku |
| Recency | 38 | 56 | o3 Mini High |
| Output Capacity | 65 | 83 | o3 Mini High |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 58/100 (rank #142), placing it in the top 51% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 63/100 (rank #125), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.
o3 Mini High has a 5-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 13% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $72.00/month with Claude 3.5 Haiku vs $82.50/month with o3 Mini High - a $10.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Claude 3.5 Haiku also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($4.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (63/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
o3 Mini High has a moderate advantage with a 5.200000000000003-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Claude 3.5 Haiku has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Claude 3.5 Haiku
13% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Anthropic
| Capability | Claude 3.5 Haiku | o3 Mini High |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
Anthropic
OpenAI
Claude 3.5 Haiku saves you $1.02/month
That's 14% cheaper than o3 Mini High at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Claude 3.5 Haiku | o3 Mini High |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K | 200K |
| Max Output Tokens | 8,192 | 100,000 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Nov 4, 2024 | Feb 12, 2025 |
o3 Mini High scores 63/100 (rank #125) compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 58/100 (rank #142), giving it a 5-point advantage. o3 Mini High is the stronger overall choice, though Claude 3.5 Haiku may excel in specific areas like cost efficiency.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is ranked #142 and o3 Mini High is ranked #125 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper at $4.00/M output tokens vs o3 Mini High's $4.40/M output tokens - 1.1x more expensive. Input token pricing: Claude 3.5 Haiku at $0.80/M vs o3 Mini High at $1.10/M.
Claude 3.5 Haiku has a larger context window of 200,000 tokens compared to o3 Mini High's 200,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.