Skip to content

o3 vs Qwen3 Max

o3

OpenAI

87#43
vs
Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

67#128
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo3DeltaQwen3 Max
Capabilities
100
+50
50
Benchmarks
88
+20
69
Pricing
92
-4
96
Context window size
84
-2
86
Recency
48
-29
77
Output Capacity
83
+8
75
Overall Result
3 wins
of 6
3 wins
It's a tie - both models win 3 signals each

Score History

Score History (24 data points)
o3Qwen3 Max
o3

86.7

current score

Leader

o3

right now

Qwen3 Max

67.4

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o3

OpenAI

Per request$0.006000
Daily$20.00
Monthly$600.00
Annual$7200.00

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

Best Value
Per request$0.002730
Daily$9.10
Monthly$273.00
Annual$3276.00

Qwen3 Max saves you $327.00/month

That's $3924.00/year compared to o3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

55% cheaper
Choose Qwen3 Max for cost optimization

o3 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$8.00/M tokens
Qwen3 Max pricing:
Input:$0.78/M tokens
Output:$3.90/M tokens
Winner
o3

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

67

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico3Qwen3 MaxWinner
Overall Score
87
67
o3
Rank#43#128
o3
Quality Rank#43#128
o3
Adoption Rank#43#128
o3
Parameters------
Context Window200K262K
Qwen3 Max
Pricing$2.00/$8.00/M$0.78/$3.90/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
50
o3
Benchmarks
88
69
o3
Pricing
92
96
Qwen3 Max
Context window size
84
86
Qwen3 Max
Recency
48
77
Qwen3 Max
Output Capacity
83
75
o3
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
o3: 1Qwen3 Max: 0
o3
Qwen3 Max
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
92.3%-
MMLU-Pro
85.8%85.7%
GPQA Diamond
87.7%-
MATH-500
99%-
HumanEval
97%-
SWE-bench Verified
71.7%-
AIME 2024
96.7%-
IFEval
92%-
BBH
93%-
Arena Elo
1415-
LiveBench
74.8%-
HLE
30.1%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o3Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #43), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3 MaxCompetitive

Scores 67/100 (rank #128), placing it in the top 56% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

o3 has a 19-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o3 when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Qwen3 Max when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
Cost-Performance Analysis
o3
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$8.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.115
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$150.00
Qwen3 MaxBest Value
Input cost$0.78/M tokens
Output cost$3.90/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.069
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$70.20

Qwen3 Max offers 53% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $70.20/month with Qwen3 Max vs $150.00/month with o3 - a $79.80 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o3Faster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3 Max
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Qwen3 Max also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen3 Max

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($3.90/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Qwen3 Max

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (87/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o3
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3

o3 clearly outperforms Qwen3 Max with a significant 19.299999999999997-point lead. For most general use cases, o3 is the stronger choice. However, Qwen3 Max may still excel in niche scenarios.

o3
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Alibaba

  • Choose for Cost - 53% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
Capabilityo3Qwen3 Max
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o3

OpenAI

$13.20
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba

Best Value
$6.08
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3 Max saves you $7.12/month

That's 54% cheaper than o3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero3Qwen3 Max
Context Window200K262K
Max Output Tokens100,00032,768
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedApr 16, 2025Sep 23, 2025
Last updated: 55m ago

Related comparisons

o3 vs Qwen3 Max (2026) | LM Market Cap