Skip to content

o1 vs R1

o1

OpenAI

74#75
vs
R1

DeepSeek

74#76
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo1DeltaR1
Capabilities
100
+33
67
Benchmarks
77
+3
73
Pricing
40
-57
98
Context window size
76
+1
75
Recency
29
-6
36
Output Capacity
83
+13
70
Overall Result
4 wins
of 6
2 wins
o1 wins 4 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (21 data points)
o1R1
o1

74

current score

Leader

o1

right now

R1

73.7

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o1

OpenAI

Per request$0.045000
Daily$150.00
Monthly$4500.00
Annual$54000.00

R1

DeepSeek

Best Value
Per request$0.001950
Daily$6.50
Monthly$195.00
Annual$2340.00

R1 saves you $4305.00/month

That's $51660.00/year compared to o1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

96% cheaper
Choose R1 for cost optimization

o1 pricing:
Input:$15.00/M tokens
Output:$60.00/M tokens
R1 pricing:
Input:$0.70/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
Winner
o1

OpenAI

74

Composite Score

R1

DeepSeek

74

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico1R1Winner
Overall Score
74
74
o1
Rank#75#76
o1
Quality Rank#75#76
o1
Adoption Rank#75#76
o1
Parameters------
Context Window200K164K
o1
Pricing$15.00/$60.00/M$0.70/$2.50/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
67
o1
Benchmarks
77
73
o1
Pricing
40
98
R1
Context window size
76
75
o1
Recency
29
36
R1
Output Capacity
83
70
o1
Benchmark Head-to-Head(13 benchmarks)
o1: 6R1: 4
o1
R1
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
91.8%90.8%
MMLU-Pro
80.3%84%
GPQA Diamond
78%71.5%
MATH-500
96.4%97.3%
HumanEval
92.4%-
SWE-bench Verified
48.9%49.2%
AIME 2024
83.3%79.8%
IFEval
86.5%83.3%
BBH
89%85%
Arena Elo
13501369
LiveBench
-67.3%
HLE
8.12%-
BigCodeBench
32.4%29.7%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o1Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #75), placing it in the top 74% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
R1Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #76), placing it in the top 74% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o1 when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose R1 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
o1
Input cost$15.00/M tokens
Output cost$60.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$1.014
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$1125.00
R1Best Value
Input cost$0.70/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.043
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$48.00

R1 offers 96% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $48.00/month with R1 vs $1125.00/month with o1 - a $1077.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o1Faster
Speed score0/100
R1
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o1

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. R1 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o1

Long document analysis

Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

o1

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

R1

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (74/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o1

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o1
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o1

o1 and R1 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.29999999999999716 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

o1
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by DeepSeek

  • Choose for Cost - 96% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
Capabilityo1R1
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o1

OpenAI

$99.00
estimated monthly cost

R1

DeepSeek

Best Value
$4.26
estimated monthly cost

R1 saves you $94.74/month

That's 96% cheaper than o1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero1R1
Context Window200K164K
Max Output Tokens100,00016,000
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedDec 17, 2024Jan 20, 2025
Last updated: 47m ago

Related comparisons

o1 vs R1 (2026) | LM Market Cap