Skip to content

Fugu Max vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Fugu Max

sakana

40#246
vs
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Xiaomi

76#117
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalFugu MaxDeltaMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Capabilities
100
+17
83
Pricing
94
-5
99
Context window size
95
0
96
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
82
0
82
Overall Result
1 wins
of 5
3 wins
MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 3 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (3 data points)
Fugu MaxMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Fugu Max

40

current score

Leader

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

right now

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

76.2

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Fugu Max

sakana

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Xiaomi

Best Value
Per request$0.000870
Daily$2.90
Monthly$87.00
Annual$1044.00

MiMo-V2.6-Pro saves you $413.00/month

That's $4956.00/year compared to Fugu Max at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

83% cheaper
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro for cost optimization

Fugu Max pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Pro pricing:
Input:$0.43/M tokens
Output:$0.87/M tokens
Fugu Max

sakana

40

Composite Score

Winner
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Xiaomi

76

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricFugu MaxMiMo-V2.6-ProWinner
Overall Score
40
76
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Rank#246#117
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Quality Rank#246#117
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Adoption Rank#246#117
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Parameters------
Context Window1000K1049K
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Pricing$2.00/$6.00/M$0.43/$0.87/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
83
Fugu Max
Pricing
94
99
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Context window size
95
96
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Recency
100
100
Fugu Max
Output Capacity
82
82
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Fugu MaxEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #246), placing it in the top 16% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
MiMo-V2.6-ProStrong Performer

Scores 76/100 (rank #117), placing it in the top 60% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a 36-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Fugu Max when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Fugu Max
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.200
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00
MiMo-V2.6-ProBest Value
Input cost$0.43/M tokens
Output cost$0.87/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.017
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$19.58

MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers 84% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $19.58/month with MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs $120.00/month with Fugu Max - a $100.42 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Fugu MaxFaster
Speed score0/100
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Fugu Max

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. MiMo-V2.6-Pro also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Fugu Max

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.87/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (76/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Fugu Max
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro clearly outperforms Fugu Max with a significant 36.2-point lead. For most general use cases, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger choice. However, Fugu Max may still excel in niche scenarios.

by sakana

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Recommended

by Xiaomi

  • Choose for Cost - 84% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityFugu MaxMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Fugu Max

sakana

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Xiaomi

Best Value
$1.83
estimated monthly cost

MiMo-V2.6-Pro saves you $8.97/month

That's 83% cheaper than Fugu Max at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterFugu MaxMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Context Window1M1.0M
Max Output Tokens128,000131,072
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedSep 11, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Last updated: 22m ago

Related comparisons

Fugu Max vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro (2026) | LM Market Cap