Nemotron 3 Super vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
| Signal | Nemotron 3 Super | Delta | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -17 | |
Pricing | 100 | +2 | |
Context window size | 96 | -4 | |
Recency | 89 | -4 | |
Output Capacity | 67 | -33 | |
Benchmarks | 0 | -86 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 5 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
right now
87.9
current score
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
xAI
Nemotron 3 Super saves you $222.50/month
That's $2670.00/year compared to Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Super | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 88 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Rank | #344 | #59 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Quality Rank | #344 | #59 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Adoption Rank | #344 | #59 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Parameters | 120B | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1049K | 2000K | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Pricing | $0.07/$0.40/M | $1.25/$2.50/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 83 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Pricing | 100 | 98 | Nemotron 3 Super |
| Context window size | 96 | 100 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Recency | 89 | 93 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Output Capacity | 67 | 100 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Benchmarks | -- | 86 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #344), placing it in the top -18% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 88/100 (rank #59), placing it in the top 80% of all 290 models tracked.
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has a 48-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Choose Nemotron 3 Super when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Agentic applications using tool/function calling
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Choose Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (2000K token context)
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Nemotron 3 Super offers 87% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $7.12/month with Nemotron 3 Super vs $56.25/month with Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent - a $49.13 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Nemotron 3 Super also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (2000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.40/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (88/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent clearly outperforms Nemotron 3 Super with a significant 47.900000000000006-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger choice. However, Nemotron 3 Super may still excel in niche scenarios.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Nemotron 3 Super
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Nemotron 3 Super
87% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Nemotron 3 Super
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Nemotron 3 Super
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Nemotron 3 Super
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by NVIDIA
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 87% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Nemotron 3 Super | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
xAI
Nemotron 3 Super saves you $4.63/month
That's 88% cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Nemotron 3 Super | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 2M |
| Max Output Tokens | 16,384 | 1,800,000 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Created | Mar 11, 2026 | Mar 31, 2026 |