Skip to content

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Grok Build 0.1

Nova Pro 1.0

Amazon

40#356
vs
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalNova Pro 1.0DeltaGrok Build 0.1
Capabilities
50
-50
100
Pricing
97
-1
98
Context window size
87
+1
86
Recency
22
-78
100
Output Capacity
62
+42
20
Overall Result
2 wins
of 5
3 wins
Grok Build 0.1 wins 3 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
Nova Pro 1.0Grok Build 0.1
Nova Pro 1.0

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Grok Build 0.1

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Nova Pro 1.0

Amazon

Per request$0.002400
Daily$8.00
Monthly$240.00
Annual$2880.00

Grok Build 0.1

xAI

Best Value
Per request$0.002000
Daily$6.67
Monthly$200.00
Annual$2400.00

Grok Build 0.1 saves you $40.00/month

That's $480.00/year compared to Nova Pro 1.0 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

17% cheaper
Choose Grok Build 0.1 for cost optimization

Nova Pro 1.0 pricing:
Input:$0.80/M tokens
Output:$3.20/M tokens
Grok Build 0.1 pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$2.00/M tokens
Tie
Nova Pro 1.0

Amazon

40

Composite Score

Tie
Grok Build 0.1

xAI

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricNova Pro 1.0Grok Build 0.1Winner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#356#260
Grok Build 0.1
Quality Rank#356#260
Grok Build 0.1
Adoption Rank#356#260
Grok Build 0.1
Parameters------
Context Window300K256K
Nova Pro 1.0
Pricing$0.80/$3.20/M$1.00/$2.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
100
Grok Build 0.1
Pricing
97
98
Grok Build 0.1
Context window size
87
86
Nova Pro 1.0
Recency
22
100
Grok Build 0.1
Output Capacity
62
20
Nova Pro 1.0
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Nova Pro 1.0Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #356), placing it in the top -22% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok Build 0.1Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #260), placing it in the top 11% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Nova Pro 1.0 when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements

Choose Grok Build 0.1 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Nova Pro 1.0
Input cost$0.80/M tokens
Output cost$3.20/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.100
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$60.00
Grok Build 0.1Best Value
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$2.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.075
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$45.00

Grok Build 0.1 offers 25% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $45.00/month with Grok Build 0.1 vs $60.00/month with Nova Pro 1.0 - a $15.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Nova Pro 1.0Faster
Speed score0/100
Grok Build 0.1
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Nova Pro 1.0

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok Build 0.1 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Nova Pro 1.0

Long document analysis

Larger context window (300K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Nova Pro 1.0

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Grok Build 0.1

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Nova Pro 1.0

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Nova Pro 1.0
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Nova Pro 1.0

Nova Pro 1.0 and Grok Build 0.1 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Nova Pro 1.0
Recommended

by Amazon

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by xAI

  • Choose for Cost - 25% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityNova Pro 1.0Grok Build 0.1
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoningdiffers
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Nova Pro 1.0

Amazon

$5.28
estimated monthly cost

Grok Build 0.1

xAI

Best Value
$4.20
estimated monthly cost

Grok Build 0.1 saves you $1.08/month

That's 20% cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterNova Pro 1.0Grok Build 0.1
Context Window300K256K
Max Output Tokens5,120--
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedDec 5, 2024May 20, 2026
Last updated: 20m ago

Related comparisons

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Grok Build 0.1 (2026) | LM Market Cap