Skip to content
Architecture
January 28, 20267 min read

The Rise of Mixture-of-Experts

MoE architectures deliver frontier performance at a fraction of the cost. How they work and who leads.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models activate only a subset of their parameters for each token, dramatically reducing inference costs while maintaining quality. Among the 100 coding models we track, 1 use MoE or sparse architectures.

1
MoE Models
99
Dense Models
79
MoE Avg Score
/100
87
Dense Avg Score
/100

Top MoE Models

These models use sparse mixture-of-experts or similar architectures that activate only a fraction of total parameters per forward pass.

How MoE Works

Traditional dense transformers activate every parameter for every token. MoE models instead use a router network to select a subset of expert layers for each input. For example, a 397B parameter model might only activate 17B parameters per token - delivering the quality of a large model at the inference cost of a small one.

This architecture has been adopted by major players including DeepSeek (V3 series), Qwen (3.5 series), and Meta (Llama 4 Maverick). The trend toward MoE is accelerating as providers seek to offer better quality-per-dollar ratios.

Cost Efficiency

The primary advantage of MoE is cost efficiency. By activating fewer parameters, providers can offer lower token prices while maintaining competitive quality. In our data, MoE models average 79/100 vs 87/100 for dense models - a gap that is narrowing rapidly.

Key Takeaways

1 MoE models are now competitive in the coding category, up from near-zero two years ago.
MoE architectures offer 3-10x cost reduction per token compared to equivalent dense models.
The quality gap between MoE and dense models has effectively closed for most practical applications.
Expect MoE to become the default architecture for new model releases in 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions

MoE architectures deliver frontier performance at a fraction of the cost. How they work and who leads.

Reports are published regularly and use live data that refreshes hourly. The analysis and rankings reflect the most current information available.

We use a composite scoring system weighing benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores are normalized to a 0-100 scale.

Yes - click any model name to see its full profile, or use our comparison tool at /compare to see side-by-side analysis of any two models.

Want to explore the data yourself?

The Rise of Mixture-of-Experts | LM Market Cap