Skip to content
最近更新: 58m ago
Coding 基准测试

BigCodeBench (Hard) 排行榜

Practical code generation requiring use of libraries, APIs, and complex program structures. The 'Hard' subset tests non-trivial engineering tasks.

为什么重要: More realistic than HumanEval — tests practical programming skills including library usage, API calls, and multi-file reasoning.

顶级模型

72.1%

Claude Opus 4.6

平均评分

39.0%

共44个模型

已测试模型

44

指标: pass@1

人类基准

-

评分范围: 0%100%

BigCodeBench Scores - Top 25 Models

Ranked by BigCodeBench score (%)

LMMarketCap.com

模型排名

All models with a reported BigCodeBench score, ranked by highest pass@1.

#4
51.1%
#6
49.7%
#7
48.9%
#8
48.2%
#10
46.9%
#12
46.1%
#15
46%
#16
45.9%
#17
45.8%
#18
45.5%
#18
45.5%
#20
43.8%
#21
40.6%
#22
39.4%
#26
33.8%
#27
33.1%
#29
32.4%
#29
32.4%
#31
31.8%
#34
29.7%
#34
29.7%
#36
28.4%
#37
27.7%
#39
27%
#40
23.6%
#42
23%
#43
16.9%

关于 BigCodeBench

全名
BigCodeBench (Hard)
类别
Coding
指标
pass@1 (%)
评分范围
0%100%
人类基准
尚未确定
状态
启用
Frequently Asked Questions

BigCodeBench is a standardized evaluation that measures AI model performance on specific tasks. It provides comparable scores across different models, helping developers choose the right model for their needs.

Claude Opus 4.6 currently holds the top score on the BigCodeBench benchmark. See our full rankings table above for the complete leaderboard with 44 models.

We update benchmark data from multiple sources including HuggingFace open-source model leaderboards and LMArena. Scores are refreshed regularly as new evaluations are published and new models are released.

No. While BigCodeBench is an important indicator, real-world performance depends on many factors including pricing, latency, context window, and specific task requirements. We recommend using our composite score which weighs multiple benchmarks and practical factors.

相关基准测试

BigCodeBench Benchmark - AI Code Generation Leaderboard (2026) | LM Market Cap