Skip to content

Mellum vs Mistral Medium 3

Mellum

JetBrains

23#343
vs
Mistral Medium 3

Mistral AI

15#345
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalMellumDeltaMistral Medium 3
Capabilities
17
-50
67
Pricing
100
+2
98
Context window size
0
-81
81
Recency
56
+4
51
Output Capacity
20
--
20
Overall Result
2 wins
of 5
2 wins
It's a tie - both models win 2 signals each

Score History

Score History (24 data points)
MellumMistral Medium 3
Mellum

22.7

current score

Leader

Mellum

right now

Mistral Medium 3

14.6

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Mellum

JetBrains

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

Mistral Medium 3

Mistral AI

Per request$0.001400
Daily$4.67
Monthly$140.00
Annual$1680.00

Mellum saves you $140.00/month

That's $1680.00/year compared to Mistral Medium 3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose Mellum for cost optimization

Mellum pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
Mistral Medium 3 pricing:
Input:$0.40/M tokens
Output:$2.00/M tokens
Winner
Mellum

JetBrains

23

Composite Score

Mistral Medium 3

Mistral AI

15

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricMellumMistral Medium 3Winner
Overall Score
23
15
Mellum
Rank#343#345
Mellum
Quality Rank#343#345
Mellum
Adoption Rank#343#345
Mellum
Parameters------
Context Window--131K--
PricingFree$0.40/$2.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
17
67
Mistral Medium 3
Pricing
100
98
Mellum
Context window size
0
81
Mistral Medium 3
Recency
56
51
Mellum
Output Capacity
20
20
Mellum
Benchmark Head-to-Head(1 benchmarks)
Mellum: 0Mistral Medium: 0
Mellum
Mistral Medium
Normalized 0-100%
HLE
-4.52%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

MellumLimited

Scores 23/100 (rank #343), placing it in the top -18% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Mistral Medium 3Limited

Scores 15/100 (rank #345), placing it in the top -19% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Mellum has a 8-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Mellum when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized

Choose Mistral Medium 3 when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (131K token context)
  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
Cost-Performance Analysis
Mellum
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00
Mistral Medium 3
Input cost$0.40/M tokens
Output cost$2.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.164
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$36.00

Compare the cost per quality point to find the best value for your specific workload.

Latency & Speed
MellumFaster
Speed score0/100
Mistral Medium 3
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Mellum

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Mellum also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Mellum

Long document analysis

Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Mistral Medium 3

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Mellum

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (23/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Mellum

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Mistral Medium 3
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Mellum

Mellum has a moderate advantage with a 8.1-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Mistral Medium 3 has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.

Mellum
Recommended

by JetBrains

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Mistral AI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityMellumMistral Medium 3
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Mellum

JetBrains

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

Mistral Medium 3

Mistral AI

$3.12
estimated monthly cost

Mellum saves you $3.12/month

That's 100% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterMellumMistral Medium 3
Context Window--131K
Max Output Tokens----
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJun 1, 2025May 7, 2025
Last updated: 27m ago

相关对比

Mellum vs Mistral Medium 3 (2026) | LM Market Cap