Skip to content

Mellum vs Grok 4.7

Mellum

JetBrains

20#430
vs
Grok 4.7

xAI

89#43
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalMellumDeltaGrok 4.7
Capabilities
17
-83
100
Pricing
100
+5
95
Context window size
0
-90
90
Recency
46
-54
100
Output Capacity
20
-70
90
Benchmarks
0
-86
86
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
5 wins
Grok 4.7 wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (28 data points)
MellumGrok 4.7
Mellum

20.2

current score

Leader

Grok 4.7

right now

Grok 4.7

88.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Mellum

JetBrains

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

Grok 4.7

xAI

Per request$0.004000
Daily$13.33
Monthly$400.00
Annual$4800.00

Mellum saves you $400.00/month

That's $4800.00/year compared to Grok 4.7 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose Mellum for cost optimization

Mellum pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
Grok 4.7 pricing:
Input:$1.60/M tokens
Output:$4.80/M tokens
Mellum

JetBrains

20

Composite Score

Winner
Grok 4.7

xAI

89

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricMellumGrok 4.7Winner
Overall Score
20
89
Grok 4.7
Rank#430#43
Grok 4.7
Quality Rank#430#43
Grok 4.7
Adoption Rank#430#43
Grok 4.7
Parameters------
Context Window--500K--
PricingFree$1.60/$4.80/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
17
100
Grok 4.7
Pricing
100
95
Mellum
Context window size
0
90
Grok 4.7
Recency
46
100
Grok 4.7
Output Capacity
20
90
Grok 4.7
Benchmarks--
86
Grok 4.7
Benchmark Head-to-Head(11 benchmarks)
Mellum: 0Grok 4.7: 0
Mellum
Grok 4.7
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-91.5%
MMLU-Pro
-83.5%
GPQA Diamond
-82%
MATH-500
-95%
HumanEval
-95.5%
SWE-bench Verified
-70%
AIME 2024
-88%
IFEval
-91%
BBH
-90%
Arena Elo
-1462
LiveBench
-73%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

MellumLimited

Scores 20/100 (rank #430), placing it in the top -48% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.7Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #43), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Grok 4.7 has a 69-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Mellum when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized

Choose Grok 4.7 when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (500K token context)
  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Mellum
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00
Grok 4.7
Input cost$1.60/M tokens
Output cost$4.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.072
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$96.00

Compare the cost per quality point to find the best value for your specific workload.

Latency & Speed
MellumFaster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.7
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Mellum

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Mellum also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Mellum

Long document analysis

Larger context window (500K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Grok 4.7

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Mellum

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok 4.7

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Grok 4.7
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 clearly outperforms Mellum with a significant 68.6-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 4.7 is the stronger choice. However, Mellum may still excel in niche scenarios.

by JetBrains

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Grok 4.7
Recommended

by xAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityMellumGrok 4.7
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoningdiffers
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Mellum

JetBrains

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.7

xAI

$8.64
estimated monthly cost

Mellum saves you $8.64/month

That's 100% cheaper than Grok 4.7 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterMellumGrok 4.7
Context Window--500K
Max Output Tokens--450,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJun 1, 2025Sep 21, 2026
Last updated: 19m ago

相关对比

Mellum vs Grok 4.7 (2026) | LM Market Cap