Mistral Large 2407 vs Step 3.5 Flash
| Signal | Mistral Large 2407 | Delta | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 55 | -11 | |
Pricing | 94 | -6 | |
Context window size | 81 | -5 | |
Recency | 21 | -79 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -60 | |
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 6 | 5 wins |
Score History
65.9
current score
Step 3.5 Flash
right now
66.2
current score
Mistral Large 2407
Mistral AI
Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun
Step 3.5 Flash saves you $475.00/month
That's $5700.00/year compared to Mistral Large 2407 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Mistral Large 2407 | Step 3.5 Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66 | 66 | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Rank | #136 | #135 | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Quality Rank | #136 | #135 | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Adoption Rank | #136 | #135 | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 262K | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Pricing | $2.00/$6.00/M | $0.10/$0.30/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 50 | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Benchmarks | 55 | 66 | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Pricing | 94 | 100 | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Context window size | 81 | 86 | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Recency | 21 | 100 | Step 3.5 Flash |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 80 | Step 3.5 Flash |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 66/100 (rank #136), placing it in the top 53% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 66/100 (rank #135), placing it in the top 54% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose Mistral Large 2407 when you need:
- Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements
Choose Step 3.5 Flash when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Processing long documents or large codebases (262K token context)
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Step 3.5 Flash offers 95% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $6.00/month with Step 3.5 Flash vs $120.00/month with Mistral Large 2407 - a $114.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Step 3.5 Flash also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.30/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (66/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Mistral Large 2407 and Step 3.5 Flash are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.29999999999999716 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Mistral Large 2407
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Step 3.5 Flash
95% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Mistral Large 2407
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Mistral Large 2407
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Mistral Large 2407
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Mistral AI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Mistral Large 2407 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Mistral Large 2407
Mistral AI
Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun
Step 3.5 Flash saves you $10.26/month
That's 95% cheaper than Mistral Large 2407 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Mistral Large 2407 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | 65,536 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Nov 19, 2024 | Jan 29, 2026 |