Skip to content

ALLaM 34B vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

ALLaM 34B

HUMAIN

40#310
vs
Qwen3 Coder Flash

Alibaba

40#308
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalALLaM 34BDeltaQwen3 Coder Flash
Capabilities
17
-33
50
Pricing
100
+1
99
Context window size
57
-38
95
Recency
66
-4
70
Output Capacity
58
-19
77
Overall Result
1 wins
of 5
4 wins
Qwen3 Coder Flash wins 4 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (28 data points)
ALLaM 34BQwen3 Coder Flash
ALLaM 34B

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Qwen3 Coder Flash

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

ALLaM 34B

HUMAIN

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Alibaba

Per request$0.000682
Daily$2.27
Monthly$68.25
Annual$819.00

ALLaM 34B saves you $68.25/month

That's $819.00/year compared to Qwen3 Coder Flash at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose ALLaM 34B for cost optimization

ALLaM 34B pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
Qwen3 Coder Flash pricing:
Input:$0.20/M tokens
Output:$0.97/M tokens
Tie
ALLaM 34B

HUMAIN

40

Composite Score

Tie
Qwen3 Coder Flash

Alibaba

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricALLaM 34BQwen3 Coder FlashWinner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#310#308
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Quality Rank#310#308
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Adoption Rank#310#308
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Parameters34B----
Context Window4K1000K
Qwen3 Coder Flash
PricingFree$0.20/$0.97/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
17
50
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Pricing
100
99
ALLaM 34B
Context window size
57
95
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Recency
66
70
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Output Capacity
58
77
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

ALLaM 34BEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #310), placing it in the top -7% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3 Coder FlashEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #308), placing it in the top -6% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose ALLaM 34B when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized

Choose Qwen3 Coder Flash when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
Cost-Performance Analysis
ALLaM 34B
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input cost$0.20/M tokens
Output cost$0.97/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.029
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$17.55

Compare the cost per quality point to find the best value for your specific workload.

Latency & Speed
ALLaM 34BFaster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

ALLaM 34B

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. ALLaM 34B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

ALLaM 34B

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

ALLaM 34B

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

ALLaM 34B
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
ALLaM 34B

ALLaM 34B and Qwen3 Coder Flash are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

ALLaM 34B
Recommended

by HUMAIN

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Alibaba

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityALLaM 34BQwen3 Coder Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

ALLaM 34B

HUMAIN

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Alibaba

$1.52
estimated monthly cost

ALLaM 34B saves you $1.52/month

That's 100% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterALLaM 34BQwen3 Coder Flash
Context Window4K1M
Max Output Tokens4,09665,536
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedAug 25, 2025Sep 17, 2025
Last updated: 58m ago

Related comparisons

ALLaM 34B vs Qwen3 Coder Flash (2026) | LM Market Cap