Skip to content

Seed 1.6 vs Devstral 2 2512

Seed 1.6

ByteDance

40#341
vs
Devstral 2 2512

Mistral AI

40#343
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalSeed 1.6DeltaDevstral 2 2512
Capabilities
83
+33
50
Pricing
98
--
98
Context window size
86
--
86
Recency
83
+3
81
Output Capacity
72
-13
85
Overall Result
2 wins
of 5
1 wins
Seed 1.6 wins 2 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (32 data points)
Seed 1.6Devstral 2 2512
Seed 1.6

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Devstral 2 2512

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Seed 1.6

ByteDance

Best Value
Per request$0.001250
Daily$4.17
Monthly$125.00
Annual$1500.00

Devstral 2 2512

Mistral AI

Per request$0.001400
Daily$4.67
Monthly$140.00
Annual$1680.00

Seed 1.6 saves you $15.00/month

That's $180.00/year compared to Devstral 2 2512 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

11% cheaper
Choose Seed 1.6 for cost optimization

Seed 1.6 pricing:
Input:$0.25/M tokens
Output:$2.00/M tokens
Devstral 2 2512 pricing:
Input:$0.40/M tokens
Output:$2.00/M tokens
Tie
Seed 1.6

ByteDance

40

Composite Score

Tie
Devstral 2 2512

Mistral AI

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricSeed 1.6Devstral 2 2512Winner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#341#343
Seed 1.6
Quality Rank#341#343
Seed 1.6
Adoption Rank#341#343
Seed 1.6
Parameters------
Context Window262K262K--
Pricing$0.25/$2.00/M$0.40/$2.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
50
Seed 1.6
Pricing
98
98
Seed 1.6
Context window size
86
86
Seed 1.6
Recency
83
81
Seed 1.6
Output Capacity
72
85
Devstral 2 2512
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Seed 1.6Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #341), placing it in the top -17% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Devstral 2 2512Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #343), placing it in the top -18% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Seed 1.6 when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Devstral 2 2512 when you need:

  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Seed 1.6Best Value
Input cost$0.25/M tokens
Output cost$2.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.056
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$33.75
Devstral 2 2512
Input cost$0.40/M tokens
Output cost$2.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.060
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$36.00

Seed 1.6 offers 6% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $33.75/month with Seed 1.6 vs $36.00/month with Devstral 2 2512 - a $2.25 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Seed 1.6Faster
Speed score0/100
Devstral 2 2512
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Seed 1.6

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Seed 1.6 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Seed 1.6

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Seed 1.6

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Seed 1.6

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Seed 1.6

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Seed 1.6
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6 and Devstral 2 2512 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Seed 1.6
Recommended

by ByteDance

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 6% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Mistral AI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilitySeed 1.6Devstral 2 2512
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Seed 1.6

ByteDance

Best Value
$2.85
estimated monthly cost

Devstral 2 2512

Mistral AI

$3.12
estimated monthly cost

Seed 1.6 saves you $0.2700/month

That's 9% cheaper than Devstral 2 2512 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterSeed 1.6Devstral 2 2512
Context Window262K262K
Max Output Tokens32,768209,715
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedDec 23, 2025Dec 9, 2025
Last updated: 10m ago

Related comparisons

Seed 1.6 vs Devstral 2 2512 (2026) | LM Market Cap