| Signal | Composer 2 | Delta | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -17 | |
Pricing | 3 | -97 | |
Context window size | 84 | -- | |
Recency | 100 | +36 | |
Output Capacity | 80 | -3 | |
Benchmarks | 0 | -81 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
10
days higher
3
days
17
days higher
Cursor
OpenAI
Composer 2 saves you $44825.00/month
That's $537900.00/year compared to o1-pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Composer 2 | o1-pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 76 | 76 | Composer 2 |
| Rank | #107 | #109 | Composer 2 |
| Quality Rank | #107 | #109 | Composer 2 |
| Adoption Rank | #107 | #109 | Composer 2 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 200K | 200K | -- |
| Pricing | $0.50/$2.50/M | $150.00/$600.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 67 | o1-pro |
| Pricing | 3 | 100 | o1-pro |
| Context window size | 84 | 84 | Composer 2 |
| Recency | 100 | 65 | Composer 2 |
| Output Capacity | 80 | 83 | o1-pro |
| Benchmarks | -- | 82 | o1-pro |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 76/100 (rank #107), placing it in the top 63% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 76/100 (rank #109), placing it in the top 63% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Composer 2 offers 100% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $45.00/month with Composer 2 vs $11250.00/month with o1-pro - a $11205.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Composer 2 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (76/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Composer 2 and o1-pro are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.10000000000000853 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Composer 2
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Composer 2
100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Composer 2
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Composer 2
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Composer 2
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Cursor
| Capability | Composer 2 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Cursor
OpenAI
Composer 2 saves you $986.10/month
That's 100% cheaper than o1-pro at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Composer 2 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K | 200K |
| Max Output Tokens | 65,536 | 100,000 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Dec 1, 2025 | Mar 19, 2025 |
Composer 2 scores 76/100 (rank #107) compared to o1-pro's 76/100 (rank #109), giving it a 0-point advantage. Composer 2 is the stronger overall choice, though o1-pro may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
Composer 2 is ranked #107 and o1-pro is ranked #109 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Composer 2 is cheaper at $2.50/M output tokens vs o1-pro's $600.00/M output tokens - 240.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: Composer 2 at $0.50/M vs o1-pro at $150.00/M.
Composer 2 has a larger context window of 200,000 tokens compared to o1-pro's 200,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.