| Signal | Llemma 7b | Delta | Gemma 3n 4B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 17 | -- | |
Pricing | 1 | +1 | |
Context window size | 57 | -14 | |
Recency | 69 | -7 | |
Output Capacity | 60 | +40 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 5 | 2 wins |
8
days higher
5
days
17
days higher
eleutherai
Gemma 3n 4B saves you $136.00/month
That's $1632.00/year compared to Llemma 7b at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Llemma 7b | Gemma 3n 4B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 47 | 46 | Llemma 7b |
| Rank | #276 | #278 | Llemma 7b |
| Quality Rank | #276 | #278 | Llemma 7b |
| Adoption Rank | #276 | #278 | Llemma 7b |
| Parameters | 7B | 4B | -- |
| Context Window | 4K | 33K | Gemma 3n 4B |
| Pricing | $0.80/$1.20/M | $0.02/$0.04/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 17 | 17 | Llemma 7b |
| Pricing | 1 | 0 | Llemma 7b |
| Context window size | 57 | 72 | Gemma 3n 4B |
| Recency | 69 | 76 | Gemma 3n 4B |
| Output Capacity | 60 | 20 | Llemma 7b |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 47/100 (rank #276), placing it in the top 5% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 46/100 (rank #278), placing it in the top 4% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 1-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Gemma 3n 4B offers 97% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $0.90/month with Gemma 3n 4B vs $30.00/month with Llemma 7b - a $29.10 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Gemma 3n 4B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (33K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.04/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (47/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Llemma 7b and Gemma 3n 4B are extremely close in overall performance (only 1.2000000000000028 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Llemma 7b
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Gemma 3n 4B
97% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Llemma 7b
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Llemma 7b
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Llemma 7b
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by eleutherai
| Capability | Llemma 7b | Gemma 3n 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
eleutherai
Gemma 3n 4B saves you $2.80/month
That's 97% cheaper than Llemma 7b at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Llemma 7b | Gemma 3n 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 4K | 33K |
| Max Output Tokens | 4,096 | -- |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Apr 14, 2025 | May 20, 2025 |
Llemma 7b scores 47/100 (rank #276) compared to Gemma 3n 4B's 46/100 (rank #278), giving it a 1-point advantage. Llemma 7b is the stronger overall choice, though Gemma 3n 4B may excel in specific areas like cost efficiency.
Llemma 7b is ranked #276 and Gemma 3n 4B is ranked #278 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Gemma 3n 4B is cheaper at $0.04/M output tokens vs Llemma 7b's $1.20/M output tokens - 30.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: Llemma 7b at $0.80/M vs Gemma 3n 4B at $0.02/M.
Gemma 3n 4B has a larger context window of 32,768 tokens compared to Llemma 7b's 4,096 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.