| Signal | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Delta | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 33 | -- | |
Pricing | 99 | -1 | |
Context window size | 81 | +19 | |
Recency | 82 | +7 | |
Output Capacity | 68 | +13 | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 5 | 1 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
Baidu
Gemma 3n 4B (free) saves you $83.00/month
That's $996.00/year compared to ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Gemma 3n 4B (free) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #240 | #242 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Quality Rank | #240 | #242 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Adoption Rank | #240 | #242 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Parameters | 300B | 4B | -- |
| Context Window | 123K | 8K | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Pricing | $0.28/$1.10/M | Free | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 33 | 33 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Pricing | 99 | 100 | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
| Context window size | 81 | 62 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Recency | 82 | 74 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
| Output Capacity | 68 | 55 | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #240), placing it in the top 18% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #242), placing it in the top 17% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Gemma 3n 4B (free) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (123K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Gemma 3n 4B (free) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Gemma 3n 4B (free)
100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Baidu
| Capability | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Baidu
Gemma 3n 4B (free) saves you $1.82/month
That's 100% cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 123K | 8K |
| Max Output Tokens | 12,000 | 2,048 |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Jun 30, 2025 | May 20, 2025 |
Both ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Gemma 3n 4B (free) score 40/100, making them extremely close competitors. Choose based on pricing, provider ecosystem, or specific capability requirements.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is ranked #240 and Gemma 3n 4B (free) is ranked #242 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
Gemma 3n 4B (free) is cheaper at $0.00/M output tokens vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B 's $1.10/M output tokens - 1100.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at $0.28/M vs Gemma 3n 4B (free) at $0.00/M.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a larger context window of 123,000 tokens compared to Gemma 3n 4B (free)'s 8,192 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.