| Signal | Gemma 3 12B | Delta | GPT-4o Search Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -- | |
Pricing | 100 | +10 | |
Context window size | 81 | +0 | |
Recency | 63 | +0 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -50 | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 5 | 1 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
OpenAI
Gemma 3 12B saves you $739.50/month
That's $8874.00/year compared to GPT-4o Search Preview at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Gemma 3 12B | GPT-4o Search Preview | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #256 | #257 | Gemma 3 12B |
| Quality Rank | #256 | #257 | Gemma 3 12B |
| Adoption Rank | #256 | #257 | Gemma 3 12B |
| Parameters | 12B | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 128K | Gemma 3 12B |
| Pricing | $0.04/$0.13/M | $2.50/$10.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 50 | Gemma 3 12B |
| Pricing | 100 | 90 | Gemma 3 12B |
| Context window size | 81 | 81 | Gemma 3 12B |
| Recency | 63 | 62 | Gemma 3 12B |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 70 | GPT-4o Search Preview |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 40/100 (rank #256), placing it in the top 12% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #257), placing it in the top 12% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Gemma 3 12B offers 99% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $2.55/month with Gemma 3 12B vs $187.50/month with GPT-4o Search Preview - a $184.95 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Gemma 3 12B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.13/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Gemma 3 12B and GPT-4o Search Preview are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Gemma 3 12B
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Gemma 3 12B
99% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Gemma 3 12B
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Gemma 3 12B
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Gemma 3 12B
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Google
| Capability | Gemma 3 12B | GPT-4o Search Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
Gemma 3 12B saves you $16.27/month
That's 99% cheaper than GPT-4o Search Preview at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Gemma 3 12B | GPT-4o Search Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | 16,384 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Created | Mar 13, 2025 | Mar 12, 2025 |
Both Gemma 3 12B and GPT-4o Search Preview score 40/100, making them extremely close competitors. Choose based on pricing, provider ecosystem, or specific capability requirements.
Gemma 3 12B is ranked #256 and GPT-4o Search Preview is ranked #257 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.13/M output tokens vs GPT-4o Search Preview's $10.00/M output tokens - 76.9x more expensive. Input token pricing: Gemma 3 12B at $0.04/M vs GPT-4o Search Preview at $2.50/M.
Gemma 3 12B has a larger context window of 131,072 tokens compared to GPT-4o Search Preview's 128,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.