Skip to content

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs SWE-1.5

vs
SWE-1.5

Windsurf

40#302
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)DeltaSWE-1.5
Capabilities
50
--
50
Pricing
98
-2
100
Context window size
52
+52
0
Recency
0
-76
76
Output Capacity
60
+40
20
Overall Result
2 wins
of 5
2 wins
It's a tie - both models win 2 signals each

Score History

Score History (21 data points)
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)SWE-1.5
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

39.4

current score

Leader

SWE-1.5

right now

SWE-1.5

39.5

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

OpenAI

Per request$0.002000
Daily$6.67
Monthly$200.00
Annual$2400.00

SWE-1.5

Windsurf

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

SWE-1.5 saves you $200.00/month

That's $2400.00/year compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose SWE-1.5 for cost optimization

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$2.00/M tokens
SWE-1.5 pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

OpenAI

39

Composite Score

Winner
SWE-1.5

Windsurf

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)SWE-1.5Winner
Overall Score
39
40
SWE-1.5
Rank#303#302
SWE-1.5
Quality Rank#303#302
SWE-1.5
Adoption Rank#303#302
SWE-1.5
Parameters------
Context Window4K----
Pricing$1.00/$2.00/MFree--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
50
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Pricing
98
100
SWE-1.5
Context window size
52
0
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Recency
0
76
SWE-1.5
Output Capacity
60
20
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Entry Level

Scores 39/100 (rank #303), placing it in the top -4% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
SWE-1.5Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #302), placing it in the top -4% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements

Choose SWE-1.5 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$2.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.076
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$45.00
SWE-1.5
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Faster
Speed score0/100
SWE-1.5
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. SWE-1.5 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

Long document analysis

Larger context window (4K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

SWE-1.5

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

SWE-1.5
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
SWE-1.5

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and SWE-1.5 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.10000000000000142 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
SWE-1.5
Recommended

by Windsurf

  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)SWE-1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

OpenAI

$4.20
estimated monthly cost

SWE-1.5

Windsurf

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

SWE-1.5 saves you $4.20/month

That's 100% cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)SWE-1.5
Context Window4K--
Max Output Tokens4,096--
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJan 25, 2024Sep 1, 2025
Last updated: 8m ago

Related comparisons

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs SWE-1.5 (2026) | LM Market Cap