GPT-4.1 (batch) vs GLM 4.5V
| Signal | GPT-4.1 (batch) | Delta | GLM 4.5V |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 70 | +3 | |
Pricing | 96 | -2 | |
Context window size | 96 | +19 | |
Recency | 33 | -22 | |
Output Capacity | 72 | +5 | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 6 | 2 wins |
Score History
67.7
current score
Tied
right now
67.7
current score
GPT-4.1 (batch)
OpenAI
GLM 4.5V
Zhipu AI
GLM 4.5V saves you $150.00/month
That's $1800.00/year compared to GPT-4.1 (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 (batch) | GLM 4.5V | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68 | 68 | -- |
| Rank | #149 | #147 | GLM 4.5V |
| Quality Rank | #149 | #147 | GLM 4.5V |
| Adoption Rank | #149 | #147 | GLM 4.5V |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1048K | 66K | GPT-4.1 (batch) |
| Pricing | $1.00/$4.00/M | $0.60/$1.80/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 83 | GPT-4.1 (batch) |
| Benchmarks | 70 | 68 | GPT-4.1 (batch) |
| Pricing | 96 | 98 | GLM 4.5V |
| Context window size | 96 | 76 | GPT-4.1 (batch) |
| Recency | 33 | 55 | GLM 4.5V |
| Output Capacity | 72 | 67 | GPT-4.1 (batch) |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 68/100 (rank #149), placing it in the top 49% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 68/100 (rank #147), placing it in the top 50% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose GPT-4.1 (batch) when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1048K token context)
Choose GLM 4.5V when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
GLM 4.5V offers 52% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $36.00/month with GLM 4.5V vs $75.00/month with GPT-4.1 (batch) - a $39.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GLM 4.5V also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1048K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($1.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (68/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-4.1 (batch) and GLM 4.5V are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT-4.1 (batch)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GLM 4.5V
52% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4.1 (batch)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4.1 (batch)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4.1 (batch)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT-4.1 (batch) | GLM 4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
GPT-4.1 (batch)
OpenAI
GLM 4.5V
Zhipu AI
GLM 4.5V saves you $3.36/month
That's 51% cheaper than GPT-4.1 (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4.1 (batch) | GLM 4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 66K |
| Max Output Tokens | 32,768 | 16,384 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Apr 14, 2025 | Aug 11, 2025 |