GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Grok 4.7
| Signal | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | Delta | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 88 | +2 | |
Pricing | 98 | +3 | |
Context window size | 89 | -1 | |
Recency | 76 | -24 | |
Output Capacity | 82 | -9 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
Score History
87.8
current score
Grok 4.7
right now
88.8
current score
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
OpenAI
Grok 4.7
xAI
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini saves you $275.00/month
That's $3300.00/year compared to Grok 4.7 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | Grok 4.7 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 88 | 89 | Grok 4.7 |
| Rank | #59 | #43 | Grok 4.7 |
| Quality Rank | #59 | #43 | Grok 4.7 |
| Adoption Rank | #59 | #43 | Grok 4.7 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 500K | Grok 4.7 |
| Pricing | $0.25/$2.00/M | $1.60/$4.80/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 100 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Benchmarks | 88 | 86 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Pricing | 98 | 95 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini |
| Context window size | 89 | 90 | Grok 4.7 |
| Recency | 76 | 100 | Grok 4.7 |
| Output Capacity | 82 | 90 | Grok 4.7 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 88/100 (rank #59), placing it in the top 80% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 89/100 (rank #43), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 1-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Choose Grok 4.7 when you need:
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini offers 65% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $33.75/month with GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs $96.00/month with Grok 4.7 - a $62.25 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (500K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Grok 4.7 are extremely close in overall performance (only 1 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
65% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 65% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
OpenAI
Grok 4.7
xAI
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini saves you $5.79/month
That's 67% cheaper than Grok 4.7 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 400K | 500K |
| Max Output Tokens | 128,000 | 450,000 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Nov 13, 2025 | Sep 21, 2026 |