Skip to content

Grok 4.5 vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.5

xAI

89#44
vs
Grok 4.7

xAI

89#42
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGrok 4.5DeltaGrok 4.7
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
76
-11
86
Pricing
94
-1
95
Context window size
90
--
90
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
90
--
90
Overall Result
0 wins
of 6
2 wins
Grok 4.7 wins 2 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (8 data points)
Grok 4.5Grok 4.7
Grok 4.5

88.8

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Grok 4.7

88.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Grok 4.5

xAI

Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Grok 4.7

xAI

Best Value
Per request$0.004000
Daily$13.33
Monthly$400.00
Annual$4800.00

Grok 4.7 saves you $100.00/month

That's $1200.00/year compared to Grok 4.5 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

20% cheaper
Choose Grok 4.7 for cost optimization

Grok 4.5 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Grok 4.7 pricing:
Input:$1.60/M tokens
Output:$4.80/M tokens
Tie
Grok 4.5

xAI

89

Composite Score

Tie
Grok 4.7

xAI

89

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGrok 4.5Grok 4.7Winner
Overall Score
89
89
--
Rank#44#42
Grok 4.7
Quality Rank#44#42
Grok 4.7
Adoption Rank#44#42
Grok 4.7
Parameters------
Context Window500K500K--
Pricing$2.00/$6.00/M$1.60/$4.80/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
Grok 4.5
Benchmarks
76
86
Grok 4.7
Pricing
94
95
Grok 4.7
Context window size
90
90
Grok 4.5
Recency
100
100
Grok 4.5
Output Capacity
90
90
Grok 4.5
Benchmark Head-to-Head(11 benchmarks)
Grok 4.5: 1Grok 4.7: 0
Grok 4.5
Grok 4.7
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-91.5%
MMLU-Pro
-83.5%
GPQA Diamond
-82%
MATH-500
-95%
HumanEval
-95.5%
SWE-bench Verified
-70%
AIME 2024
-88%
IFEval
-91%
BBH
-90%
Arena Elo
14681462
LiveBench
-73%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Grok 4.5Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #44), placing it in the top 85% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.7Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #42), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Grok 4.5 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Grok 4.7 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
Grok 4.5
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.090
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00
Grok 4.7Best Value
Input cost$1.60/M tokens
Output cost$4.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.072
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$96.00

Grok 4.7 offers 20% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $96.00/month with Grok 4.7 vs $120.00/month with Grok 4.5 - a $24.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Grok 4.5Faster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.7
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Grok 4.5

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok 4.7 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Grok 4.5

Long document analysis

Larger context window (500K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Grok 4.5

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($4.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Grok 4.7

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok 4.5

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Grok 4.5
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 and Grok 4.7 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Grok 4.5
Recommended

by xAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by xAI

  • Choose for Cost - 20% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGrok 4.5Grok 4.7
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Grok 4.5

xAI

$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.7

xAI

Best Value
$8.64
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.7 saves you $2.16/month

That's 20% cheaper than Grok 4.5 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGrok 4.5Grok 4.7
Context Window500K500K
Max Output Tokens450,000450,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJul 8, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Last updated: 58m ago

Related comparisons

Grok 4.5 vs Grok 4.7 (2026) | LM Market Cap