Skip to content

GPT-5 vs Grok 4.5

GPT-5

OpenAI

88#20
vs
Grok 4.5

xAI

88#22
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalGPT-5DeltaGrok 4.5
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
88
+1
86
Pricing
90
-4
94
Context window size
80
-1
81
Recency
72
-28
100
Output Capacity
85
+65
20
Overall Result
2 wins
of 6
3 wins
Grok 4.5 wins 3 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (21 data points)
GPT-5Grok 4.5
GPT-5

88.2

current score

Leader

GPT-5

right now

Grok 4.5

87.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

GPT-5

OpenAI

Per request$0.006250
Daily$20.83
Monthly$625.00
Annual$7500.00

Grok 4.5

xAI

Best Value
Per request$0.005000
Daily$16.67
Monthly$500.00
Annual$6000.00

Grok 4.5 saves you $125.00/month

That's $1500.00/year compared to GPT-5 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

20% cheaper
Choose Grok 4.5 for cost optimization

GPT-5 pricing:
Input:$1.25/M tokens
Output:$10.00/M tokens
Grok 4.5 pricing:
Input:$2.00/M tokens
Output:$6.00/M tokens
Winner
GPT-5

OpenAI

88

Composite Score

Grok 4.5

xAI

88

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricGPT-5Grok 4.5Winner
Overall Score
88
88
GPT-5
Rank#20#22
GPT-5
Quality Rank#20#22
GPT-5
Adoption Rank#20#22
GPT-5
Parameters------
Context Window400K500K
Grok 4.5
Pricing$1.25/$10.00/M$2.00/$6.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
GPT-5
Benchmarks
88
86
GPT-5
Pricing
90
94
Grok 4.5
Context window size
80
81
Grok 4.5
Recency
72
100
Grok 4.5
Output Capacity
85
20
GPT-5
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
GPT-5: 9Grok 4.5: 1
GPT-5
Grok 4.5
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
93%91.5%
MMLU-Pro
84.5%83.5%
GPQA Diamond
85%82%
MATH-500
92.5%95%
HumanEval
96.5%95.5%
SWE-bench Verified
75%70%
AIME 2024
-88%
IFEval
92%91%
BBH
90.5%90%
Arena Elo
14651462
LiveBench
76%73%
HLE
35%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

GPT-5Elite Tier

Scores 88/100 (rank #20), placing it in the top 93% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.5Elite Tier

Scores 88/100 (rank #22), placing it in the top 93% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose GPT-5 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Grok 4.5 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
GPT-5
Input cost$1.25/M tokens
Output cost$10.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.128
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$168.75
Grok 4.5Best Value
Input cost$2.00/M tokens
Output cost$6.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.091
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$120.00

Grok 4.5 offers 29% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $120.00/month with Grok 4.5 vs $168.75/month with GPT-5 - a $48.75 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
GPT-5Faster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.5
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

GPT-5

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok 4.5 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

GPT-5

Long document analysis

Larger context window (500K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Grok 4.5

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($6.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Grok 4.5

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (88/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

GPT-5

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

GPT-5
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
GPT-5

GPT-5 and Grok 4.5 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.4000000000000057 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

GPT-5
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by xAI

  • Choose for Cost - 29% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityGPT-5Grok 4.5
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

GPT-5

OpenAI

$14.25
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.5

xAI

Best Value
$10.80
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.5 saves you $3.45/month

That's 24% cheaper than GPT-5 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterGPT-5Grok 4.5
Context Window400K500K
Max Output Tokens128,000--
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedAug 7, 2025Jul 8, 2026
Last updated: 32m ago

Related comparisons

GPT-5 vs Grok 4.5 (2026) | LM Market Cap